Tiger feels like it's made from paper ...
28 Jun 2013, 22:24 PM
#1
Posts: 27
Totally worthless for 600 mp and 250 fuel atm ...
28 Jun 2013, 23:02 PM
#2
Posts: 396
Agree 100%
Worthless.
Worthless.
28 Jun 2013, 23:13 PM
#3
Posts: 255
it is about as worthless as the IS-2 it seems only the super assult guns are worth the cost
29 Jun 2013, 02:14 AM
#4
Posts: 642
I was playing a 2v2 match yesterday, where we managed to call in several Tigers.
They are very strong... but something's off.
I remember back in the beginning days of vCoH a single Tiger or Pershing literally had you shuffling and repositioning your forces, because these tanks packed a real punch. Up front, you had to outnumber them at least 3 or 4 to one in a frontal fight, and even then.
Right now, if I was able to call in a tiger, either my opponent isn't calling ANYTHING, because he lost, or the game is a team battle stalemate where nothing but heavy tanks will make a difference.
The ISU-52 kills a Tiger, in most scenarios. Not because its stronger, but because its stun mechanic is akin to the Brummbar I think (1 every three to stun) and it has a massive range. If there's any measure of enemy infantry in the field, it will also gain vet fast, and then you have yourself a dedicated AI tank duking it out with your supposed end gamer.
Like I said: they are statistically strong, but something feels off. They require a huge fuel sacrifice to the Tank Gods to bring into the game, but they become tactically worthless at that point, because you are either already spearheading through the enemy, or at a stalemate.
They are very strong... but something's off.
I remember back in the beginning days of vCoH a single Tiger or Pershing literally had you shuffling and repositioning your forces, because these tanks packed a real punch. Up front, you had to outnumber them at least 3 or 4 to one in a frontal fight, and even then.
Right now, if I was able to call in a tiger, either my opponent isn't calling ANYTHING, because he lost, or the game is a team battle stalemate where nothing but heavy tanks will make a difference.
The ISU-52 kills a Tiger, in most scenarios. Not because its stronger, but because its stun mechanic is akin to the Brummbar I think (1 every three to stun) and it has a massive range. If there's any measure of enemy infantry in the field, it will also gain vet fast, and then you have yourself a dedicated AI tank duking it out with your supposed end gamer.
Like I said: they are statistically strong, but something feels off. They require a huge fuel sacrifice to the Tank Gods to bring into the game, but they become tactically worthless at that point, because you are either already spearheading through the enemy, or at a stalemate.
29 Jun 2013, 13:48 PM
#5
Posts: 101
ummm disagree?
had a stolen p4, 2 t-34's, and 2 zis all hitting one tiger (just sitting there, he wasnt microing it at all). frontal and side and even some rear shots as he moved it back.
took about 4 minutes to die and would have killed everything if i hadn't rammed it about 2.5 minutes in. still killed both zis and then first shot on a t-34 took it to 60% health...ramming time.
so yeah tiger is badass but i agree that the cost of heavy tanks is off right now.
had a stolen p4, 2 t-34's, and 2 zis all hitting one tiger (just sitting there, he wasnt microing it at all). frontal and side and even some rear shots as he moved it back.
took about 4 minutes to die and would have killed everything if i hadn't rammed it about 2.5 minutes in. still killed both zis and then first shot on a t-34 took it to 60% health...ramming time.
so yeah tiger is badass but i agree that the cost of heavy tanks is off right now.
29 Jun 2013, 16:24 PM
#6
Posts: 27
ummm disagree?
had a stolen p4, 2 t-34's, and 2 zis all hitting one tiger (just sitting there, he wasnt microing it at all). frontal and side and even some rear shots as he moved it back.
took about 4 minutes to die and would have killed everything if i hadn't rammed it about 2.5 minutes in. still killed both zis and then first shot on a t-34 took it to 60% health...ramming time.
so yeah tiger is badass but i agree that the cost of heavy tanks is off right now.
2x SU-85s will rape the Tiger in 4 frontal shots. Happened yesterday 1 AT grenade from conscripts and gg
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
11 | |||||
11 | |||||
713 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.1109614.644+10
- 4.607220.734+1
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
841 users are online:
841 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49110
Welcome our newest member, jhonnycena0400
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, jhonnycena0400
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM