Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
side upgrades are not out of the questions (we are/have explored) and might be something to come in the future.
fuel upgrades were obviously warranted due to the increase in fuel and the data reflected it.
We will continue to monitor the data and trends and adjust things accordingly from there.
Posts: 392
When you fix flakbug ? Now flak weapons do litlle to no daamge to squads in buildings
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
centaur also has that problem
Posts: 721
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Well then it is not very bood fix Is it ? Because it might have required effect of first incoming vehicle but what about 2nd or 3rd unit ? What about replacing losses ?
If relic wanted to delay tanks they should introduce some 50FU upgrade similar to british Hammer/Anvil otherwise we are agan getting to situation whne loosing single vehicle in early in tank combat is GG for OKW.
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
people saying shocks are weak..??/ what world i am in ok if you dont wanaa compare shocks and obers what about commando,ranger,falls,para costing 10 popcap...??
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
7 
Posts: 1664
The JP4 is in an interesting place now that PZ4 and Panther are more expensive. Probably still won't be built a lot since they aren't great at Vet 0 but still...
Posts: 919
OKW
Pak 43 88mm Anti-Tank Gun population cost decreased from 13 to 10
Posts: 721
Rangers cost 10. Paras Cost 9. Falls cost 8. The popcap is like a food chain indicator. The only thing that is fishy to me is that Sturm pios are 9 and shocks are 8.
Also pios shouldn't be 6 but 5. They are worse than suppers.
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
the stats.coh2.hu says that falls popcap is 10.?? may wanna fix that.
Posts: 431
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Increasing the cost of tanks is a bad idea. The only thing that needed to be increased is the tech costs. Now it's like the fuel penalty is still there, but only for half the army.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 2561
Increasing the cost of tanks is a bad idea. The only thing that needed to be increased is the tech costs. Now it's like the fuel penalty is still there, but only for half the army.Yes that's the entire point, an it's a good thing. Only their late game units needed the penalty. Having it on all of it, perticularly the light vehicles made them underpowered in 1v1. Like pigsoup said, their replacability needed a nerf not their timing.
Posts: 36
Posts: 431
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Pak 43 88mm Anti-Tank Gun population cost decreased from 13 to 10
Posts: 392
17 pounder still 20?
Posts: 36
17 pounder still 20?
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
maybe 16 pop cap will be fine, cuz their crew can't be snipe or kill
that emplacement also has 800 HP, like Panther, Pershing, Comet, T-34/85 ect
damage 320, like other superior Tank Destroyer,
maybe relic think, that 17 pdr emplacement is static Tank Destroyer, so their pop cap is 20 like other superior Tank Destroyer
 |
|
|
114 | ||
 |
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
133 | ||
|
|
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
8 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
