Why didn't I know the Road to Kharkov map has changed a lot?
16 Dec 2015, 00:56 AM
#21
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
I like the changes other than the cut offs. It's much more open so there's more avenues of approach and 3 mgs won't be able to lock down the whole map
16 Dec 2015, 01:13 AM
#22
1 
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
I'm not a fan of the new buildings, it leads to an annoying rush to control them at the start of the game. Brits get shafted if they can't hold the buildings with no indirect fire.
Tobis "Complete Throw"
Someone asked what my avatar was from... I really don't know.
Defeated Paula and knocked him out of 2v2 Anniversary Cup
Someone asked what my avatar was from... I really don't know.
Defeated Paula and knocked him out of 2v2 Anniversary Cup
16 Dec 2015, 01:35 AM
#23
Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1
Cut off is too far back , imo. I like the openness of the center too.
16 Dec 2015, 01:41 AM
#24
Posts: 232
I'm not a huge fan of the open middle so far. It just feels a bit... plain, featureless. A few pieces of cover would make it look a bit more interesting for me.
16 Dec 2015, 02:37 AM
#25
19 Posts: 1295 | Subs: 1
How it is better?
Cutoffs are unacceptable.
This is the kind of thinking that is ruining coh2. for the love of god. wtf.
16 Dec 2015, 02:41 AM
#26
Posts: 1384
I'm not a fan of the new buildings, it leads to an annoying rush to control them at the start of the game. Brits get shafted if they can't hold the buildings with no indirect fire.
Brits have two forms of indirect fire: Pyrotechnics base Howitzer barrage and a mortar pit.
They also have a flamethrower on wheels.
Hello everyone, thanks for all the feedback regarding the changes to Road to Kharkov.
I was hesitant moving 2 of the cut-off points so far back, but figured I'd try it out and see what the response was like. With that said I have no problem moving them a bit further forward (back towards their old positions).
Please continue to post your feedback.
thanks
I would definitely prefer them to be moved forward a bit.
I also think that the strat points can be a bit too clustered. You can cap 3-4 of them in the same time it would take to do 1-2 on other maps.
16 Dec 2015, 05:50 AM
#27
2 
Posts: 1108
I like the new map design. Much better then before
 | Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
16 Dec 2015, 06:48 AM
#28
Posts: 509 | Subs: 1
How it is better?
Cutoffs are unacceptable.
Hmgs, especially brit hmg in a small balding near right vp covers half of the map.
Everything is too open, so spam even more hmgs, flanking are impossible anyway.
It took some serious effort to turn bad map into one of the worst maps.
I agree with you when I'm playing in 2vs2 mode. I would rather play north old kharkov than any position in new kharkov anyday.
16 Dec 2015, 15:20 PM
#29
1 
Posts: 551
Hello everyone, thanks for all the feedback regarding the changes to Road to Kharkov.
I was hesitant moving 2 of the cut-off points so far back, but figured I'd try it out and see what the response was like. With that said I have no problem moving them a bit further forward (back towards their old positions).
Please continue to post your feedback.
thanks
I generally dont like the cutoff mechanic. It makes the game too straight forward and predictable.
16 Dec 2015, 18:41 PM
#30
Posts: 245
I would move the cut offs up some, but not all the way up to where they were before.
16 Dec 2015, 19:18 PM
#31
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
And what do you guys think of the new minsk map? I really like the changes they made, the mid is more open I love that! It makes the map much better. Good job to the mapmakers! 
16 Dec 2015, 23:32 PM
#32
Posts: 230
Permanently BannedMinsk change was good. Kharkov change, not so much for some reason. If they just made kharkov the same as before but put gaps in the forests in the middle and made the map wider from the forested side, it would be much better.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
323 | ||
 |
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1109614.644+10
- 5.275108.718+26
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
936 users are online:
936 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM