Why the scott needs to be better:
- Late game unit, when the resources are required for other stuff
- Costs fuel,
- short range, kinda
- The latest nerfs were silly and unjustified
Why the Pack Craziness needs to calm down:
- The AOE is insane at the moment, no explanation needed
- Sick range
- Sick Pen
- comes too early
[USF] Buff the Scott, Nerf the pack
1 Dec 2015, 12:19 PM
#1
Posts: 322
Brummbar is very powerful
1 Dec 2015, 12:32 PM
#2
Posts: 830
Have you ever played vs double scotts? The things wipe everything that isn't armor 
A buff that could be done is its building time, it takes ages to build them..
A buff that could be done is its building time, it takes ages to build them..
1 Dec 2015, 12:37 PM
#3
2 
Posts: 1108
pls stop flooding the forum, with so many polls each day
 | Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Dec 2015, 12:49 PM
#4
Posts: 228
i saw someone using 2 scotts and ... it definitely don't need a buff.
1 Dec 2015, 12:59 PM
#5
Posts: 571
Double scott and a jakson is quite brutal, so no.
No buffs.
Unlike Pack Howitzer, the Scott can do this amazing thing called "reverse" while firing on the move, allowing it to kite blobs/ infantry and support other tanks against inf attack.
No buffs.
Unlike Pack Howitzer, the Scott can do this amazing thing called "reverse" while firing on the move, allowing it to kite blobs/ infantry and support other tanks against inf attack.
1 Dec 2015, 12:59 PM
#6
Posts: 322
i saw someone using 2 scotts and ... it definitely don't need a buff.So I assume you are the only dude who chose "yep" as the answer
Brummbar is very powerful
1 Dec 2015, 13:01 PM
#7
Posts: 571
So I assume you are the only dude who chose "yep" as the answer
I actually think people didn't read the poll question properly.
Not seeing something does not mean it is weak, by the way. It just mean USF has more meta options, and the correct way to handle this is to nerf the meta units in line with other USF units.
Not buffing the Scott to meta levels.
Then there are also the issue of what game mode you are on? 4v4? or 1v1? Game play flow is completely different in the modes.... So yeah, this thread is actually kinda pointless.
1 Dec 2015, 13:16 PM
#8
Posts: 228
i think the scott is fine dude , i voted no !
1 Dec 2015, 13:19 PM
#9
Posts: 1653
I haven't seen any scotts in a while now, played this weekend some 2v2's with my mate and for the first time in ages I was 2 scotts on the field.
1 Dec 2015, 13:22 PM
#10
Posts: 150
hell NO
| Playercard of BlackHooligan | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Dec 2015, 19:01 PM
#11
Posts: 322
The scott is utterly useless at that late time in game.
Brummbar is very powerful
1 Dec 2015, 19:33 PM
#12
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Let's not feed this thread and move along 
2 Dec 2015, 14:43 PM
#13
Posts: 322
Holy shit the amount of useless and ineffective units in this game are quite frustrating.
Brummbar is very powerful
2 Dec 2015, 14:53 PM
#14
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Scotts are fine.
2 Dec 2015, 14:55 PM
#15
Posts: 1653
Scotts are fine.
This person has no right of speaking Kappa (Love you Rawr Rawr!)
Scotts are indeed fine, Aerohank can make good use of them, perhaps people just have to learn to play with them again
2 Dec 2015, 15:13 PM
#16
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
pls stop flooding the forum, with so many polls each day
shhh . He want to defeat katitof in forum wariority
2 Dec 2015, 15:15 PM
#17
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
i think the scott is fine dude , i voted no !
You voted for yes.
THe poll question is : have you ever seen scott ? Yes/No
This can be translated as ? Scott need buff ? No/Yes because these 2 yestions are opposites.
I misuderstood it first so i voted for something that i dont want too
2 Dec 2015, 15:19 PM
#18
Posts: 228
You voted for yes.
THe poll question is : have you ever seen scott ? Yes/No
This can be translated as ? Scott need buff ? No/Yes because these 2 yestions are opposites.
I misuderstood it first so i voted for something that i dont want too
my bad ! misunderstood too ... i don't think the scott needs any buff.
2 Dec 2015, 15:43 PM
#19
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Performance of the unit is directly related to the skill of the player. You could argue that it is fulfilling a role which is not needed but you can't argue that the unit is bad.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
2 Dec 2015, 17:16 PM
#20
Posts: 322
Performance of the unit is directly related to the skill of the player.No, it is directly related to its stats.
Brummbar is very powerful
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
69 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
109 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265