Login

russian armor

[USF] Buff the Scott, Nerf the pack

Ever faced the scott recently in any automatch mode?
Option Distribution Votes
67%
33%
Total votes: 67
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
1 Dec 2015, 12:19 PM
#1
avatar of sorryWTFisthis

Posts: 322

Why the scott needs to be better:
- Late game unit, when the resources are required for other stuff
- Costs fuel,
- short range, kinda
- The latest nerfs were silly and unjustified

Why the Pack Craziness needs to calm down:


- The AOE is insane at the moment, no explanation needed
- Sick range
- Sick Pen
- comes too early
1 Dec 2015, 12:32 PM
#2
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 830

Have you ever played vs double scotts? The things wipe everything that isn't armor :foreveralone:

A buff that could be done is its building time, it takes ages to build them..
1 Dec 2015, 12:37 PM
#3
avatar of MoerserKarL
Donator 22

Posts: 1108

pls stop flooding the forum, with so many polls each day
1 Dec 2015, 12:49 PM
#4
avatar of IGOR

Posts: 228

i saw someone using 2 scotts and ... it definitely don't need a buff.
1 Dec 2015, 12:59 PM
#5
avatar of mortiferum

Posts: 571

Double scott and a jakson is quite brutal, so no.

No buffs.

Unlike Pack Howitzer, the Scott can do this amazing thing called "reverse" while firing on the move, allowing it to kite blobs/ infantry and support other tanks against inf attack.

1 Dec 2015, 12:59 PM
#6
avatar of sorryWTFisthis

Posts: 322

jump backJump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 12:49 PMIGOR
i saw someone using 2 scotts and ... it definitely don't need a buff.
So I assume you are the only dude who chose "yep" as the answer :thumb:
1 Dec 2015, 13:01 PM
#7
avatar of mortiferum

Posts: 571

So I assume you are the only dude who chose "yep" as the answer :thumb:


I actually think people didn't read the poll question properly.

Not seeing something does not mean it is weak, by the way. It just mean USF has more meta options, and the correct way to handle this is to nerf the meta units in line with other USF units.

Not buffing the Scott to meta levels.

Then there are also the issue of what game mode you are on? 4v4? or 1v1? Game play flow is completely different in the modes.... So yeah, this thread is actually kinda pointless.
1 Dec 2015, 13:16 PM
#8
avatar of IGOR

Posts: 228

i think the scott is fine dude , i voted no !
1 Dec 2015, 13:19 PM
#9
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

I haven't seen any scotts in a while now, played this weekend some 2v2's with my mate and for the first time in ages I was 2 scotts on the field.
1 Dec 2015, 13:22 PM
#10
avatar of BlackHooligan

Posts: 150

hell NO
1 Dec 2015, 19:01 PM
#11
avatar of sorryWTFisthis

Posts: 322

The scott is utterly useless at that late time in game.
1 Dec 2015, 19:33 PM
#12
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Let's not feed this thread and move along :)
2 Dec 2015, 14:43 PM
#13
avatar of sorryWTFisthis

Posts: 322

Holy shit the amount of useless and ineffective units in this game are quite frustrating.
2 Dec 2015, 14:53 PM
#14
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

Scotts are fine.
2 Dec 2015, 14:55 PM
#15
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

Scotts are fine.


This person has no right of speaking Kappa (Love you Rawr Rawr!)

Scotts are indeed fine, Aerohank can make good use of them, perhaps people just have to learn to play with them again :sibHeart:
2 Dec 2015, 15:13 PM
#16
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

pls stop flooding the forum, with so many polls each day



shhh . He want to defeat katitof in forum wariority :snfPeter:
2 Dec 2015, 15:15 PM
#17
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

jump backJump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 13:16 PMIGOR
i think the scott is fine dude , i voted no !


You voted for yes.

THe poll question is : have you ever seen scott ? Yes/No
This can be translated as ? Scott need buff ? No/Yes because these 2 yestions are opposites.
I misuderstood it first so i voted for something that i dont want too :(
2 Dec 2015, 15:19 PM
#18
avatar of IGOR

Posts: 228



You voted for yes.

THe poll question is : have you ever seen scott ? Yes/No
This can be translated as ? Scott need buff ? No/Yes because these 2 yestions are opposites.
I misuderstood it first so i voted for something that i dont want too :(


my bad ! misunderstood too ... i don't think the scott needs any buff.
2 Dec 2015, 15:43 PM
#19
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Performance of the unit is directly related to the skill of the player. You could argue that it is fulfilling a role which is not needed but you can't argue that the unit is bad.
2 Dec 2015, 17:16 PM
#20
avatar of sorryWTFisthis

Posts: 322

Performance of the unit is directly related to the skill of the player.
No, it is directly related to its stats.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

718 users are online: 718 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM