Anyone else would like this map to get reworked, updated and put in Coh2 automatch rotation?
Wrecked Train
15 Sep 2015, 19:44 PM
#1
Posts: 167
Permanently BannedWith the recent revamped VCoh maps, I am really surprised this one hasn't been added since they started the revamps. I always loved and enjoyed this map, since you could flank in many ways, mine very strategically and the map just felt balanced.
Anyone else would like this map to get reworked, updated and put in Coh2 automatch rotation?
Anyone else would like this map to get reworked, updated and put in Coh2 automatch rotation?
I am realistic and thoughtful.
You're the one who is blind to that, ignoring overpowering synergy that would create for ost, imbalancing completely their tiering and tech pace.
15 Sep 2015, 20:08 PM
#2
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
wasnt it an extremely wehr favoured map
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
15 Sep 2015, 20:48 PM
#3
Posts: 167
Permanently Bannedwasnt it an extremely wehr favoured map
Not that I can remember. I used to go US sniper start with engineer spam and go hunt the MG that would be parked in the center.
I am realistic and thoughtful.
You're the one who is blind to that, ignoring overpowering synergy that would create for ost, imbalancing completely their tiering and tech pace.
17 Sep 2015, 08:05 AM
#4
Posts: 513
4ES START INTO GREYHOUND LEHGO KIDS
17 Sep 2015, 09:20 AM
#5
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
wasnt it an extremely wehr favoured map
Yes but because smoke grenades, 120mm mortar, slower wire placement, etc. it may not be so imbalanced for the coh2 armies
17 Sep 2015, 14:59 PM
#6
Posts: 85
Map was okay, but there's far better maps to put into the game.
Personally i didn't like the northern and southern VPs. They were too campy and could be defended with 1 HMG/MG bunker fairly effectively.
Almost all CoH1 maps favoured a side except if they were really neutral in all aspects (size, cover, territory size, territory placement etc). The factions were balanced as well as they could be in the end, but Brits/Wher always did well on smaller maps and Americans/PE loved open terrain and lots of flanking. As a big 2v2 player the double brit on Wolfheze was virtually unstoppable, but on Point Du Hoc they had to put their base in the middle of the map to have any chance of winning!
Personally i didn't like the northern and southern VPs. They were too campy and could be defended with 1 HMG/MG bunker fairly effectively.
Almost all CoH1 maps favoured a side except if they were really neutral in all aspects (size, cover, territory size, territory placement etc). The factions were balanced as well as they could be in the end, but Brits/Wher always did well on smaller maps and Americans/PE loved open terrain and lots of flanking. As a big 2v2 player the double brit on Wolfheze was virtually unstoppable, but on Point Du Hoc they had to put their base in the middle of the map to have any chance of winning!
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
7 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.43063.872+8
- 2.57180.877+10
- 3.800454.638-1
- 4.303163.650+3
- 5.313114.733+9
- 6.12744.743+1
- 7.194101.658-1
- 8.282161.637+1
- 9.371284.566-1
- 10.17773.708+3
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
14
Download
1354
Board Info
762 users are online:
1 member and 761 guests
good888art
good888art
3 posts in the last 24h
11 posts in the last week
81 posts in the last month
11 posts in the last week
81 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53112
Welcome our newest member, sattavalakeridge
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, sattavalakeridge
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM