Login

russian armor

DeC's state of the game review

DeC
14 Sep 2015, 21:48 PM
#1
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102

Some are wishes and some of them are actual balance issues

OKW:
  • They have to many AT options, making any kind of vehicle play extremely frustrating and time consuming(permenat repairs aye)
  • Volks need a price increase as at vet5 (which is easy with their shrecks) they beat cons, 5man IS, and RM.
  • ISG needs a penetration nerf by %50 or a major cost increase.
  • T4 needs to be more expensive to bring it in line with the other 4 factions.
  • Luchs needs a slight buff.
  • JPIV needs less health
  • JLI, sturmpios and obers should vet up slightly faster
  • Pfusils, volks vet up too fast
  • Pupchen should be moved to either T2 or T3
  • Panzershreck should be removed


SU
  • Su85 needs a penetration and accuracy buff, and reduced ROF. Slight cost increase (150)
  • Su76 cost increased to 90. Less scatter for the arty ability
  • Cons damage reduced by %20 while reciveing %30 more accuracy at vet 3 to compensate
  • T70 speed could be reduced by %10-%15
  • T3476 cost reduced to 70/280
  • DshK cost reduced to 280



OST
  • HMG42 cost should be increased to 280
  • Shahpshoohoota hitpoints should be reduced to 60
  • PIV Should already be upgraded with skirts
  • Ostwind cost down to 280/90
  • PaK40 reduced aimtime
  • Storms kars should be %20 more accurate
  • 222 cost increased to 350/40, HP increased to 320, damage up to 80, build time increased by %30
  • SdKfz251 Hitpoints should be increased to 320
  • Stug cost increased to 300/100
  • Panther cost reduced to 400/160
  • Tiger's pen increased by %15



USF
  • REs cost reduced to 120, can't pickup stuff any more
  • Sherman cost reduced to 290/90
  • Jackson penetration increased to 420, cost up to 400/150
  • .50cal cost reduced to 260
  • Pack howie cost should be reverted


    UKF
    • Croc's HP reduced by %10
    • ommandos DPS reduced by %20
    • %20 more Accuracy buff for IS as a vet3 bonus



14 Sep 2015, 21:51 PM
#2
avatar of Noorbi

Posts: 64

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 21:48 PMDeC

UKF
[list=Emplacements are fine as they are, halt the insane hysterical nerfs




That was a good joke man a really good joke...
14 Sep 2015, 21:59 PM
#3
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

I hate pretty much every one of these changes except lowering commando dps and making OKW t4 cost more.
14 Sep 2015, 22:00 PM
#4
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

mods pls :guyokay:
14 Sep 2015, 22:07 PM
#5
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Please stop making threads. This is getting ridiculous.
14 Sep 2015, 22:13 PM
#6
avatar of dOPEnEWhAIRCUT

Posts: 239

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 21:48 PMDeC
This will be my last post on this forum



Thanks.
14 Sep 2015, 22:14 PM
#7
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

Lol, pretty sure he just spun a wheel with unit names and then a second wheel that had nerf/buff on it.

Good read though, its like venturing into the mind of someone slowly losing touch with reality
DeC
14 Sep 2015, 23:15 PM
#8
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102



Thanks.
Don't get overexcited though as I may come backe when hearing the call of duty and new balance crisis's arise.
14 Sep 2015, 23:34 PM
#9
14 Sep 2015, 23:39 PM
#10
avatar of velmarg

Posts: 37

"Panzershreck should be removed"

If you take away the panzershreck, what's the point of ever building Volksgrenadiers over Panzerfusiliers? The shreck is what makes the Volks the Volks. Upgrading them with a panzershreck should simply have a more noticeable detrimental impact to their anti-infantry performance, the same way it does with Riflemen and bazookas.

"Su85 needs a penetration and accuracy buff, and reduced ROF. Slight cost increase (150)"

The buff to its penetration at the cost of a bit of ROF would set it apart from the SU76, as they currently have the same penetration values (thus why the SU85 is less common these days). Increasing the cost to 150 is a bit ridiculous, though. 120 is fine.

"Cons damage reduced by %20 while reciveing %30 more accuracy at vet 3 to compensate"

lolwat

"REs cost reduced to 120, can't pickup stuff any more"

I think you already heard everything you needed to hear about this elsewhere.

"Sherman cost reduced to 290/90"

Sherman's fine for the current cost. It's a tank with great anti-infantry punch and decent anti-armor, plus on the go repairs.

"Jackson penetration increased to 420, cost up to 400/150"

150 fuel for a TD as flimsy as the Jackson? Nawww. Jackson's fine as it is. I'd like to see it be slightly more durable, but it's the only TD with relative speed and a turret, so eh.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

669 users are online: 669 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49154
Welcome our newest member, aszxqw
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM