Bait successful, feeding the troll you must not.
On: it's not gonna happen.
i dont care about baits. This topic make sense.
Swap T-34/76 with 85?
1 Sep 2015, 00:07 AM
#41
Posts: 1487
i dont care about baits. This topic make sense.
 | Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
1 Sep 2015, 02:55 AM
#42
Posts: 508
@elchino7
Are you suggesting this thread is bait? I didn't mean it as that. I was just curious what people would think of this change. We've had some pretty huge stock changes, like making P4s a stock unit for OKW. OKW never had generalist medium tank before and adding one didn't break them, so I thought, "well, maybe Soviets having a strong medium at the end of their tech progression wouldn't break them either, and would make their army more fun to play and thematically appropriate, as well as break the hold that guard motor continues even now to have on the meta." The consensus I get from this thread, however, is that such a switch would create balance problems. Ah well.
Are you suggesting this thread is bait? I didn't mean it as that. I was just curious what people would think of this change. We've had some pretty huge stock changes, like making P4s a stock unit for OKW. OKW never had generalist medium tank before and adding one didn't break them, so I thought, "well, maybe Soviets having a strong medium at the end of their tech progression wouldn't break them either, and would make their army more fun to play and thematically appropriate, as well as break the hold that guard motor continues even now to have on the meta." The consensus I get from this thread, however, is that such a switch would create balance problems. Ah well.
1 Sep 2015, 03:17 AM
#43
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
i dont care about baits. This topic make sense.
I was talking about Kronosaur0s. He doesn't play allies and just makes bait posts.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
1 Sep 2015, 22:07 PM
#44
Posts: 97
Actually Soviets should be "OP" becouse Soviet won the WW2
lmao
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
249 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
778 users are online:
778 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM