Rotating US Base

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 721

12 Aug 2015, 06:02 AMNuclear Arbitor

and waste all the time the artists spent on the current monstrosity?

Current USF base and my brain

(MB) Why does the base look like that?
(USFB) It's the new look
(MB) It totally deviates from the other looks of the game
(USFB) Well, it just looks this way, ok?
*shakes head, plays on*

Next game

(MB) Why does the base look like that?
(USFB) It does now, remember?
(MB) Yeah but why?
(USFB) Look, it's already programmed, quit it
*sighs, plays on*

Next game

(MB) Why does the base look wrong?
(USFB) Are you serious? We have gone through this!
(MB) Yeah but it's weird, not right.
(USFB) It's like this now! WHAT?!
*plays on*

Next game

(MB) Why does the base look like that, all... tight and round?
(USFB) WHAT THE FUCK MAN?!!
*flinches, plays on*

...

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

11 Aug 2015, 17:39 PMpigsoup

can we just get a smaller base?

No, because it's US and in US everything must be bigger and larger, understand, soldier?!!?

BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.

Multi Quote

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

14 Aug 2015, 13:08 PMTrubbbel

Current USF base and my brain

...

In my head the USF base is secretly a UFO that's going to randomly come out of the ground Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull style.

That being said, it would indeed be a very nice quality of life change. The extra time running back to base to pick up weapons is bad enough without having to circle around to the back of the base as well. Can make a difference with capping or responding to threats depending on how much you are being pressured.

Oh and spoilers on the Indiana Jones ending I guess.

Posts: 3293

10 Aug 2015, 17:47 PMBeefSurge

trolling OP kappa

banhammer OP kappa

Don't derail the good threads there are plenty of bad threads to do it on.

yes i am indeed the fun police

/back on topic

Failure is always an option.

It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)

Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences.

To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage!

and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!

Multi Quote

Posts: 2742

The USF base looks the way it does so it makes you 'feel' like you're ready for action.

I usually chalk that feeling up with the fact that I start with a Rear Echelon squad that can do absolutely nothing in the base it started, much like Sturmpioneers.

Posts: 146

I like the USF base BUT the weapon rack positioning sucks. It should always be facing the front. I would like it even more if you could just upgrade the weapons on USF infantry.

Posts: 34

An easy fix for this would be giving RE's an option to build only in close proximity of the base a Weapons Rack.

Posts: 758

14 Aug 2015, 16:15 PMRimadljod

An easy fix for this would be giving RE's an option to build only in close proximity of the base a Weapons Rack.

i believe the brits have something similar that you mentioned called a forward assembly area where you can buy weapons away from your base as well as reinforce your depleted infantry units