Kick Mark Target from COH 2
Posts: 830 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
Both versions should burn in COH hell.
/salt tears
Posts: 65
Posts: 1740
Especially Guards and T34/85 synergize perfectly with Mark Target as the T34 can take out ANY Axis tank with mark target without a high risk when microed well.
Maybe take down the bonus damage to 25% instead of 33%.
But the most important part is to cancel the ability in case the plane is shot down because this is atm not the case.
And @OP: I would like you to write your reason instead of just populising like you do.
Posts: 1617
Posts: 476
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Instead of bonus damage, give bonus pen. Problem solved.
This^ Just make it so it takes RNG out of the equation rather than making it even more RNG based.
Posts: 670
Instead of bonus damage, give bonus pen. Problem solved.
How is the problem solved?
By leaving the Soviets with tanks with shit penetration and increasing it only within several doctrines and for munitions? This is the worst thing you can do with this ability.
Posts: 1617
How is the problem solved?
By leaving the Soviets with tanks with shit penetration and increasing it only within several doctrines and for munitions? This is the worst thing you can do with this ability.
Or having T-34-85s running around raping every and all vehicle doing insane damage.
My proposal would help stock Sov armor a little bit...oh wait Su-76 can pen a KTs front armor
Posts: 670
Or having T-34-85s running around raping every and all vehicle doing insane damage.
My proposal would help stock Sov armor a little bit...oh wait Su-76 can pen a KTs front armor
I don't deny the ability needs to be overhauled, but if you keep whining about T-34/85s creating more chaos using Mark Target than Ares himself, there might be something wrong with the doctrine, don't you think? I rarely see havoc when someone uses Partisan Mark Target.
Posts: 1617
I don't deny the ability needs to be overhauled, but if you keep whining about T-34/85s creating more chaos using Mark Target than Ares himself, there might be something wrong with the doctrine, don't you think? I rarely see havoc when someone uses Partisan Mark Target.
Maybe because T-34-76 has shitty pen and it doesn't matter if it gets the damage bonus from marked target when it can't pen a P4.
I don't deny that Guard Motor is BS.
Posts: 670
Maybe because T-34-76 has shitty pen and it doesn't matter if it gets the damage bonus from marked target when it can't pen a P4.
I don't deny that Guard Motor is BS.
Buff the pen then
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
Posts: 927
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
How is the problem solved?
By leaving the Soviets with tanks with shit penetration and increasing it only within several doctrines and for munitions? This is the worst thing you can do with this ability.
Making Mark Target increase pen would mean more consistent results. Less killing Tigers in 5 seconds with RNG but more consistent damage against heavily armored things like JT, KT's, and Panthers.
Kick CAS from the game, yes or no?
Entire doctrine =/= 1 ability.
Posts: 2053
Instead of bonus damage, give bonus pen. Problem solved.
Probably would be the best way.
Posts: 600
Otherwise im actually ok with it.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
What about similar command Panther ability?
No free recon + needs to be used around CPV (although you don't need LoS )
On it's own it's mostly there to give the reaaaally long reload of the Command Panther some extra punch, but it gets really nasty when paired with JT's or other TD's.
Posts: 1617
Livestreams
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.921405.695+5
- 5.634229.735+8
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.1045675.608+3
- 10.722440.621+4
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Dreufritt
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM