Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
Don't you think the lack of precision strike is going to hurt a bit? The accuracy of the Soviet mortars is a bit...well...they are firing drunk.
Posts: 207
Stug could remove target weak point in exchange for HE shell switching like isu152. That way is retains the assault gun roll.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Good one. They have same scatter values. Barrage is 40% more accurate. To balance it out due to slower rof is that they fire against smaller squads.
The advantages of the 120 are as clear as day so theres nothing to explain there
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedAOE profile, call in synergy with t1. Can run away with 1 man. Range. Im not an idiot kati.
You meant advantage? Singular.
Range is the only advantage 120mm will have now, all other stats are inferior.
axis
Posts: 600
If you are not capable to use an AT gun versus it but tanks, you are attacking a (hard) counter of your tanks. You should have a hard time.
It still has less range than a SU-85, gets 4 shot by AT guns and doesn´t kill infantry reliably any longer.
The "nurf threads" will be done by people solely relying on call in tank meta. People who don´t use combined arms. Something we want to get rid of.
AOE profile, call in synergy with t1. Can run away with 1 man. Range. Im not an idiot kati.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
AOE profile, call in synergy with t1. Can run away with 1 man. Range. Im not an idiot kati.
Longer reload and higher price are its only cons.
As for the 82mm, well 300% sounds quite large yes. But the 82mm mortar performs pretty well imo. But the lowest I could imagine putting its reaload to 250% slower. Otherwise its just too good. If you put it any lower that is.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 420
Stug G will hard-counter Allied mediums, but lose to Allied TDs - which is what Panthers and/or PaK40s are made to deal with.
It'll be a great tank for it's price.
Bad vs infantry, but it'll eat up armor for sure. Probably reliable against Is2s too, as long as there are no ZiS around.
I will simply lol at anyone expecting such a change to a 2 year old general use infantry.
Equally possible are pershing for USF, IS-3 for soviets or ober nerf for OKW.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I actually think that the Stug G will be able to deal with Allied TD thx to increased range, hp, penetration and ofc TWP.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
It didn't got increased range.
This change was scrapped.
HP and TWP on the other hand will give allied tanks a hard time and it'll take some time for people to get accustomed to the change.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So you will back up your 85 with a Su-85 in the worst case. It will be enough to defeat any "stug wall". Or, go directly to T4 and build a couple of SU-85s that will self spot AND outrange the stugs. This, if you are to lazy to flank. Plenty of solutions. False problem.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
You're as detached from the game and what actually happens in it as alex or relic.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
3 Posts: 658
After few games and couple of tests I can say that TWP for Stug G should be switched for something else. 1 Pak and 2 Stugs (or 3 Stugs) can completly stun lock IS2 and finish it.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2053
1 Pak and 2 Stugs (or 3 Stugs) can completly stun lock IS2 and finish it.
Posts: 2053
@UP
Actually, stug have 60% accuracy to directly hit infantry model, because relic QA is a bunch of chimps if it even exists.
That makes it most accurate AI vehicle in the whole game, better accuracy have only flame weapons.
While its obvious bug, its there and it doesn't seem like relic is rushing themselves to fix it.
1 Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
After few games and couple of tests I can say that TWP for Stug G should be switched for something else. 1 Pak and 2 Stugs (or 3 Stugs) can completly stun lock IS2 and finish it.
Once there was a cry about button making tanks almost immobile (tho you coud break it with smoke) and right now we have even worse thing - stun locking any heavy tank without any chance to get out. Just little micro and IS2 or any other tank is going down.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
), I can just sit and wait till IS2 is dead.
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
well should the IS2 have any use in that situation? I dont understand what you want, youre charging a heavy into a wall of vetted tank destroyers.
KT couldnt charge into vet 2+ SU85s,could it?
even flank with T3476s and t70s to clear paks and team weapons and force stugs to turn while IS2 comes up the middle with infantry.. not like you can just spam IS2s anymore anyway,why not mix up the armor,and I dont know,use tactics while attacking a position instead of a-move is2 and drop flame bombs to wipe whole army.
 |
|
|
35 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
