On me ability should be looked at

This thread is locked

New topic

Posts: 134

Imo the defensive and offensive buff for a free ability together with sprint is already to much... but what really angers me the most is that it brakes suppression.

even with 3 mg-42s in an overlapping cone of fire you can't hope to do much cuz after you suppress the incoming (double lmg, double bar, paras with lmgs) blob "on me" brakes that suppression and your mgs are focused down or wiped by nades.

mg42 is performing bad and with this ability supporting blobs i don't see what else i can do... keep in mind that t3 is not good vs us, and mortars are not very good at shooting moving/sprinting units.

imo it should not break suppression simple as that

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

It's like retreat so why it should not break suppression?

Posts: 2053

26 Feb 2015, 17:41 PMAustralian Magic

It's like retreat so why it should not break suppression?

Some retreat if the enemy is charging the mg's and killing them by negating suppression...

Posts: 550 | Subs: 1

Tip: throw a nade where the captain is -> profit. If anything this is a risky ability but nothing worthy of a balance thread.

Posts: 440

Would rather see a commander ability that negates retreat orders over a small cone for a short period of time and at a reasonable muni cost.

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

26 Feb 2015, 17:48 PMDeath's Head

Would rather see a commander ability that negates retreat orders over a small cone for a short period of time and at a reasonable muni cost.

Why?
People are complaining that too few things wipe squads recently?

Posts: 440

26 Feb 2015, 17:50 PMKatitof

Why?
People are complaining that too few things wipe squads recently?

People are complaining about how reckless blobbing can't be punished enough.

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

@ OP

Not a Balance question.

Please take your replays - narrow losses or bad losses you could not understand, to the relevant Strategy section and ask for a crit.