Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
AT Gun, 120mm... etc
Posts: 341
Posts: 466
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
You know if you pop smoke on it and then run in and double demo it will die straight away. Funnily enough if done right your opponent won't even get notice of enemies being in the vicinity and it can be lost before he can even move to protect it.
During setup it is simple to take care of.
On topic though: It has a Flak to make people make stupid amounts of threads and posts on the issue instead of finding ways to counter its use and deny OKW from some very formidable units
Your
Posts: 1740
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
IMO most people here complain because they didn't even try mortars, PaKs or Penals because everything soviet players atm do in terms of playstyle is 5-6 conscripts to IS2/T34.
I haven't seen a single T1/T2 unit in my last 10 games against the Russians.
If playing T1 you have penals and snipers which are very strong against OKW. In addition with a 120mm mortar which is also incredibly strong against OKW you can do a smoke barrage -> 2 demo charges with your penals and the OKW has lost the game.
Posts: 1701
Have you ever posted something without mentioning indirect fire? I should go for doctrinal units to counter building? Really? #ThatDesign!
You assume that ZiS will always hit. With attack ground you have to add scatter which will slow it down very hard.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
You make it sound like the doctrines with 120mm are bad or horrible or somecrap like that, lolz.
Also, those *buildings* are the heart of OKW. Counter them, and congratz, you won.
Posts: 1701
Stop trolling. I already prove to you how Flak can counter Sherman.
Does Lt, Cpt or Major force you to chose doctrine to counter them?
There is only 1 good doctrine with 120 and call ins.
Chosing doctrine to counter building is bad design.
No, you its not a win.
You missed the point at the beggining. Truck were desgin to protect area where OKW get 200% from sectors with trucks. They changed it but trucks (designed for something else) are still here.
And Im sorry but you are obvious Axis' Warrior.
Posts: 578
IMO most people here complain because they didn't even try mortars, PaKs or Penals because everything soviet players atm do in terms of playstyle is 5-6 conscripts to IS2/T34.
I haven't seen a single T1/T2 unit in my last 10 games against the Russians.
If playing T1 you have penals and snipers which are very strong against OKW. In addition with a 120mm mortar which is also incredibly strong against OKW you can do a smoke barrage -> 2 demo charges with your penals and the OKW has lost the game.
Posts: 578
Im not trolling..if your getting owned..sorry its your problemo jijijij
Its easy as building 120mm, ZiS or the mighty B4! Stop crying bro, if you dont know to click the icon of the 120mm and click the map, then uninstall plxplx
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Can 2 satchels destroy it? I don't have experience with satchell-ing it but I recall using 2 against the Med Truck and it didn't fully die, needed some AT Gun shots to finish it off.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1701
Sure, it can be killed. That's not the point. I think the point is WHY DOES THIS EVEN EXIST? In a game about cut-offs, and area denial, WHY does a BUILDING require you to commit 90% of your forces into killing it?
Posts: 738
Posts: 531
reasoning for giving out free infantry units with USF tech?
what problem does USF have that they need to be there?
if the faction's basis is to just spam rifles until you win/need extra AT, shouldn't teching for AT be the hard part of the faction? instead of just getting a free double Bazooka squad when you tech up.
Why is the captain permanently dosed up on speed at vet 3? why does he snipe infantry models and wreck light and medium tanks with ease?
would removing him hinder USF completely?
do you believe he is too powerful?
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Im not trolling..if your getting owned..sorry its your problemo jijijij
Its easy as building 120mm, ZiS or the mighty B4! Stop crying bro, if you dont know to click the icon of the 120mm and click the map, then uninstall plxplx
I have no clue, im just defending the fact that it can be easily killed, not its existance
4 Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
reasoning for giving out free infantry units with USF tech?
what problem does USF have that they need to be there?
if the faction's basis is to just spam rifles until you win/need extra AT, shouldn't teching for AT be the hard part of the faction? instead of just getting a free double Bazooka squad when you tech up.
Why is the captain permanently dosed up on speed at vet 3? why does he snipe infantry models and wreck light and medium tanks with ease?
would removing him hinder USF completely?
do you believe he is too powerful?
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 245
Posts: 410
Posts: 1701
 |
|
|
47 | ||
|
|
|
|
34 | ||
|
|
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
36 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
