Login

russian armor

Should the SU76 cost fuel?

13 Feb 2015, 22:32 PM
#21
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

Holyshit, stop spamming bullshit poll thread.
13 Feb 2015, 22:44 PM
#22
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

No. I would not call it in even if it gives me fuel for calling it! I mean, the role of this unit is not clear. Is it AT, well at mark 15 minutes it can't even penetrate a PzIV. Is it AI, why not katyusha?

Bottom line, even if you reduce the fuel price by half, it's still useless. Need a total rework.
14 Feb 2015, 01:40 AM
#23
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

su76 barrage is really good against infantry with limited maneuver room. if you ever base pin someone on a map like semiosky you can end the game early with one. that's literally the only use though, other than trolling.
14 Feb 2015, 02:10 AM
#24
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

No, it should cost munitions MVGame.

Su-76 needs a role. It was used to support infantry. In this game, it is the one that needs to be supported by everything.
14 Feb 2015, 09:33 AM
#25
avatar of Highfiveeeee

Posts: 1740

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Feb 2015, 22:31 PMwolfram
Yes to no fuel or yes to a good idea? Which is it?


THIS!!!

This poll is confusing as fuck. I think 95% voted with the same thing in mind.
14 Feb 2015, 09:43 AM
#26
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

yes
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

428 users are online: 428 guests
1 post in the last 24h
9 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48810
Welcome our newest member, Laugh461
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM