nope. ppl are just trying to find out if one of the many forum warriors does know what he is talking about rather than just pulling words out of his ass. and the general rule of thumb is that being better at the game comes with better knowledge of the game. although there are obvious exceptions.
i know that in coh2 forums, any inquiries against other's playercards are considered as witchhunt, but we have to draw the line somewhere. especially when there are a dozen forum warriors acting like coh2 gurus, calling other noobs or implying that others are noobs and never convinced by others whilst keeping their identity secret behind pathetic excuses to why they won't show their playercards.
i have yet to see more than a handful of times when non forum warriors having a go at visible abysmal playercards.
I don't call people noobs, I try to offer rational explanations for my reasoning that involve facts and stats. This idea that a person with a better playercard can spout bullshit and just because he's moderately higher ranked than others his ideas have merit. High rank means you play the game a lot, Iv met very high ranked people who have zero idea how the meta works, they just see a strat, copy it, have good micro and they succeed.
I'm not a CoH2 guru, Iv never claimed to be one, my only claim to fame really is that I just enjoy using a very very rare unit and that's about it. I get a lot of my knowledge and ideas from my friends who are defiantly higher ranked then I am. People should address the content of the argument, attacking the person just means you have no way of actually refuting his logic/reasoning and are looking for a way to lash out.