Login

russian armor

M10 vs M36?

14 Jan 2015, 19:40 PM
#1
avatar of RottenJeeves

Posts: 91

Good day fellas.

I am just curious which is the better choice? Are there situations where one is better then other one?

Personally I see very little difference. The m36 packing slightly more punch and having a tiny bit more survivability.

What you guys think?

-RJ
14 Jan 2015, 19:42 PM
#2
avatar of l4hti

Posts: 476

M10 is good against infantry, just run over them.. M10 doesnt need teching, if you are desperate for anti tank, they can save you sometimes. They are also highly spammable, nothing is funnier than swarming the field with M10s.
15 Jan 2015, 00:31 AM
#3
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

M36 and Major in general is required against supported heavier armor in the late game.

M10 can work in those rough tough games where you wont see a heavy tank,maybe a panther or two, and the guy is good at cutting off your resources and you cant tech to a major cleanly.(Khlodony ferma right side for example)
Its OKAY against the P4. nothing special

But thats about it...

Like guy above me said its GREAT for CRUSHING inf and desperate AT ,like a fast luchs thats ripping you apart and all you have is LT or something..but even then it comes so late youd be better off just hanging in there till a major anyway..




if you want to play for doctrinal armor with no major,rifle company is way better.

If the M10 came at 5,or 6 CP then it would be epic. but it doesnt. so its not really in the meta,and kinda useless and overshadowed.
15 Jan 2015, 15:17 PM
#4
avatar of RottenJeeves

Posts: 91

M36 and Major in general is required against supported heavier armor in the late game.

M10 can work in those rough tough games where you wont see a heavy tank,maybe a panther or two, and the guy is good at cutting off your resources and you cant tech to a major cleanly.(Khlodony ferma right side for example)
Its OKAY against the P4. nothing special

But thats about it...

Like guy above me said its GREAT for CRUSHING inf and desperate AT ,like a fast luchs thats ripping you apart and all you have is LT or something..but even then it comes so late youd be better off just hanging in there till a major anyway..




if you want to play for doctrinal armor with no major,rifle company is way better.

If the M10 came at 5,or 6 CP then it would be epic. but it doesnt. so its not really in the meta,and kinda useless and overshadowed.


So help me understand. The M36 is better against heavier armor such as a tiger, KT, or otherwise. While the M10 is more for Panthers/P4s etc.
18 Jan 2015, 14:51 PM
#5
avatar of ImSkemo

Posts: 444



So help me understand. The M36 is better against heavier armor such as a tiger, KT, or otherwise. While the M10 is more for Panthers/P4s etc.


Nope M36 beats M10s in AT role.. The only reason for getting M10s is if you skip Major and want to put pressure on your Opp early. like taking out his trucks, pumas

So if the match drags on M10s become a liability.
21 Jan 2015, 23:11 PM
#6
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15



So help me understand. The M36 is better against heavier armor such as a tiger, KT, or otherwise. While the M10 is more for Panthers/P4s etc.



Sorry for late reply.

The M36 is not just better, but REQUIRED against heavy armor like King tigers,Jagdtigers,and elefants,

The M10 struggles to penetrate the REAR armor of these beasts. Combine that with its fragility and its USELESS against supported massive tanks.


The M10 is "acceptable" against tanks like the Panther/Pz4 but not advised if you can avoid it. if you cant avoid it and you need a tank destroyer NOW and you dont have a major,then sure, get an M10.


a jackson is the ideal choice no matter what. Never get an M10 if you can get a jackson is a rule of thumb.
21 Jan 2015, 23:14 PM
#7
avatar of tuvok
Benefactor 115

Posts: 786

M10 = no P47 = gg
Kappa
23 Jan 2015, 07:07 AM
#8
avatar of Gbpirate
Senior Editor Badge

Posts: 1153 | Subs: 1

One thing to note is that, according to the veterancy guide, the Jackson gets penetration bonuses with vet whereas the M10 does not.
That factors into the M10 being an expensive piece of shit.

And it comes in at 7 CPs because a Stug E is 6, for example. Tryin' to make the shit balanced.
nee
11 Feb 2015, 07:46 AM
#9
avatar of nee

Posts: 1216

The M10 and Jackson is comparable to choosing StuG rather than P4. I believe the difference in fuel cost is identical as well.

If you can't get P4/ Jackson, then go for StuG/ M10. They are pretty much there for stopgaps or alternatives if you just need the AT right now but not enough fuel for something better.
11 Feb 2015, 14:59 PM
#10
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

I would love if M10 got +5range at vet 2. Puma can gets increase range with vet4, why M10 can't?
11 Feb 2015, 15:00 PM
#11
avatar of steel

Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1

I would love if M10 got +5range at vet 2. Puma can gets increase range with vet4, why M10 can't?
Crew ain't good enough. Needs to reach the 4th level of enlightenment at least. :snfBarton:
20 Feb 2015, 16:13 PM
#12
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

I would say M36 just to be on a safe side, not mention your get a major for a rally point.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

824 users are online: 824 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM