Login

russian armor

Rifle company community opinion poll

Should Rifle company be allowed in tournaments
Option Distribution Votes
10%
21%
13%
50%
6%
Total votes: 52
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
1 Dec 2014, 00:34 AM
#1
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

A subject of much debate i think it would be good to get a community poll going on the status of rifle company

Ultimately it is up to those who put their time and effort into organizing these events what they do and do not allow. But i think this would be a good tool for evaluating what most people think.


1 Dec 2014, 01:15 AM
#2
avatar of Retaliation
Donator 11

Posts: 97

If there's anything wrong with rifle company it's that the call-in comes with random vet between 1-2 rather than just coming in vet 1.
1 Dec 2014, 01:20 AM
#3
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

I'd actually prefer to see rifle company be allowed for the tournament, but have the veteran rifle call-in itself disallowed over the controversy about RNG(whoop-de-do, vet 2 rifle in house next to cutoff two minutes in, what are you supposed to do OR 300MP for a barely-vetted rifle, big deal). It wouldn't be a very strong doctrine, but it would still have a niche like mechanized/recon/other situational doctrines.
1 Dec 2014, 02:22 AM
#4
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070

i voted "what is rifle company" :D
1 Dec 2014, 02:37 AM
#5
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
I dont like this poll
1 Dec 2014, 02:43 AM
#6
avatar of voltardark

Posts: 976

Rifle comp. are one flavor among others. Coh2 is not chess, it's an asymmetrical RTS game. The problem with the tiger Ace cannot be solved by removing one of the few doctrine the US have.

You are firing yourself in the foot by doing that.

The Rifle comp. is one of the best to fight the Kat push... You will be giving OKW players a clear signal that the Kat push will success by banishing this comp.


The Removing of the Tiger Ace doc, however has no real impact on the Axis side...

Think of it. don't gimp your tournament.

My 2 cents.
1 Dec 2014, 05:19 AM
#7
avatar of Romeo
Honorary Member Badge
Benefactor 115

Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5

I think this poll would be better as simply Yes and No. Extended discussion and reasoning belong in the thread.
1 Dec 2014, 05:59 AM
#8
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

Well i seperated the choices because i figured you could just add to get simple yes/no

Also i really wanted to know why people think it should/should not be banned since i've heard perspectives from each of the 4 aforementioned groups and wanted to associate numbers with said parties
1 Dec 2014, 06:31 AM
#9
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

Every commander and bulletin should be allowed in tournaments imo.

The only time things should be banned is if they are game breaking. Even if something is overpowered, it should not be disallowed from tournament usage.
1 Dec 2014, 19:02 PM
#10
avatar of Romeo
Honorary Member Badge
Benefactor 115

Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5

I agree with Dullahan but what's most important is that tournament organizers allow or don't allow what they feel will make for the most entertaining possible tournament for both players and viewers.

I lost to cruzz on stalingrad using rifle company. He built a brummbar.

Clearly I am terrible and so is rifle company :D
1 Dec 2014, 19:08 PM
#11
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070

Well i don't know much about Rifle Company, but i want to comment on adding/disabling commanders for the tournament.

I am in favor of allowing controversial commanders having freedom of choice in playstyle and commanders in tournaments. However, there must be a balance between allowing players to freely choose commanders and banning controversial or OP commanders. It is imperative that these tournaments be fair. It would be best if players and tournament directors are not criticized for using/allowing commanders in the games. The legitimacy of the the tourny and players need to be upheld.
1 Dec 2014, 19:21 PM
#12
avatar of Mittens
Donator 11

Posts: 1276

I think its fine. I think making it so the vet 2 squad could come in at a set time rather than be up in the air but other than that its an ok doctrine. The ez8 is pretty lackluster, it unpreforms and costs more than a Jackson and the regular Sherman, its easy to counter but is the only "heavy" tank the Americans get
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

677 users are online: 677 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM