Ultimately it is up to those who put their time and effort into organizing these events what they do and do not allow. But i think this would be a good tool for evaluating what most people think.
Rifle company community opinion poll
1 Dec 2014, 00:34 AM
#1
Posts: 818
A subject of much debate i think it would be good to get a community poll going on the status of rifle company
Ultimately it is up to those who put their time and effort into organizing these events what they do and do not allow. But i think this would be a good tool for evaluating what most people think.
Ultimately it is up to those who put their time and effort into organizing these events what they do and do not allow. But i think this would be a good tool for evaluating what most people think.
 | Playercard of Hon3y | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Dec 2014, 01:15 AM
#2
1 Posts: 97
If there's anything wrong with rifle company it's that the call-in comes with random vet between 1-2 rather than just coming in vet 1.
1 Dec 2014, 01:20 AM
#3
Posts: 952 | Subs: 1
I'd actually prefer to see rifle company be allowed for the tournament, but have the veteran rifle call-in itself disallowed over the controversy about RNG(whoop-de-do, vet 2 rifle in house next to cutoff two minutes in, what are you supposed to do OR 300MP for a barely-vetted rifle, big deal). It wouldn't be a very strong doctrine, but it would still have a niche like mechanized/recon/other situational doctrines.
1 Dec 2014, 02:22 AM
#4
Posts: 2070
i voted "what is rifle company" 
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
1 Dec 2014, 02:37 AM
#5
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedI dont like this poll
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
1 Dec 2014, 02:43 AM
#6
Posts: 976
Rifle comp. are one flavor among others. Coh2 is not chess, it's an asymmetrical RTS game. The problem with the tiger Ace cannot be solved by removing one of the few doctrine the US have.
You are firing yourself in the foot by doing that.
The Rifle comp. is one of the best to fight the Kat push... You will be giving OKW players a clear signal that the Kat push will success by banishing this comp.
The Removing of the Tiger Ace doc, however has no real impact on the Axis side...
Think of it. don't gimp your tournament.
My 2 cents.
You are firing yourself in the foot by doing that.
The Rifle comp. is one of the best to fight the Kat push... You will be giving OKW players a clear signal that the Kat push will success by banishing this comp.
The Removing of the Tiger Ace doc, however has no real impact on the Axis side...
Think of it. don't gimp your tournament.
My 2 cents.
VoltarDark
Long live to COH3, the new king of all team RTS !
Long live to COH3, the new king of all team RTS !
1 Dec 2014, 05:19 AM
#7
15 Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5
I think this poll would be better as simply Yes and No. Extended discussion and reasoning belong in the thread.
| Playercard of Romeo | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Dec 2014, 05:59 AM
#8
Posts: 818
Well i seperated the choices because i figured you could just add to get simple yes/no
Also i really wanted to know why people think it should/should not be banned since i've heard perspectives from each of the 4 aforementioned groups and wanted to associate numbers with said parties
Also i really wanted to know why people think it should/should not be banned since i've heard perspectives from each of the 4 aforementioned groups and wanted to associate numbers with said parties
| Playercard of Hon3y | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Dec 2014, 06:31 AM
#9
Posts: 1384
Every commander and bulletin should be allowed in tournaments imo.
The only time things should be banned is if they are game breaking. Even if something is overpowered, it should not be disallowed from tournament usage.
The only time things should be banned is if they are game breaking. Even if something is overpowered, it should not be disallowed from tournament usage.
1 Dec 2014, 19:02 PM
#10
15 Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5
I agree with Dullahan but what's most important is that tournament organizers allow or don't allow what they feel will make for the most entertaining possible tournament for both players and viewers.
I lost to cruzz on stalingrad using rifle company. He built a brummbar.
Clearly I am terrible and so is rifle company
I lost to cruzz on stalingrad using rifle company. He built a brummbar.
Clearly I am terrible and so is rifle company
| Playercard of Romeo | |||||||||||||||||||
|
1 Dec 2014, 19:08 PM
#11
Posts: 2070
Well i don't know much about Rifle Company, but i want to comment on adding/disabling commanders for the tournament.
I am in favor of allowing controversial commanders having freedom of choice in playstyle and commanders in tournaments. However, there must be a balance between allowing players to freely choose commanders and banning controversial or OP commanders. It is imperative that these tournaments be fair. It would be best if players and tournament directors are not criticized for using/allowing commanders in the games. The legitimacy of the the tourny and players need to be upheld.
I am in favor of allowing controversial commanders having freedom of choice in playstyle and commanders in tournaments. However, there must be a balance between allowing players to freely choose commanders and banning controversial or OP commanders. It is imperative that these tournaments be fair. It would be best if players and tournament directors are not criticized for using/allowing commanders in the games. The legitimacy of the the tourny and players need to be upheld.
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
1 Dec 2014, 19:21 PM
#12
1 Posts: 1276
I think its fine. I think making it so the vet 2 squad could come in at a set time rather than be up in the air but other than that its an ok doctrine. The ez8 is pretty lackluster, it unpreforms and costs more than a Jackson and the regular Sherman, its easy to counter but is the only "heavy" tank the Americans get
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
43 | ||
|
|
|
|
25 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
227 | ||
|
|
|
|
49 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
543 users are online:
543 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49064
Welcome our newest member, cablingindfw
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, cablingindfw
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM