90 muni for a a single squad isn't worth it. Unless maybe vetted Obers or fallshirms. But for grens or volks, or just new Obers? naah to expensive, I'll wait for a better target or just use ordinary fire against static emplacements (if they are in range.)
Well I say it's damn well worth it, I also trigger my demos for a single squad. Even then, the normal barrage shot is free, ofc more rng dependant but still it's free.
Fast moving AFVs are a risky business. So is going for a flank on a Jagd when you are unsure of what is behind it. You have to consider the risk and the reward in all engagements.
I suggest it because in my own experience those get the B-4s just as often as the Stuka strikes does.
And my risk reward analysis combined with my experience tells me that it's more often than not a suicide commando that maybe ends in a decrewed B-4 and a total loss of the attacking force.
You cannot sufficiently cover the B-4 with AT-guns, mines and defences to stop it getting wiped by a large and fast enough flank. Doing so would be wasteful of resources.
So you try to negate that threat by pushing on the enemy and keeping him where I want him to fight. Preferably in my cone of fire.
I'm sorry, the base defenses and maybe 2-4 mines are all the cover it needs on the majority of 2v2 maps.
On top of that, your army always stands between your enemy and the B-4, even if they manage to get past, you'll get them on their way back.
Plus Stuka isn't a granted counter (unless luftwaffe supply) because the cost of it is so huge, especially considered the need for using tons of muni on your units as axis. (lmg, schreks, riflenades and so on)
And what's your conclusion from this sentence?