Unofficial Beta Anouncements Up

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 881

30 Mar 2013, 08:46 AMALPINA

How much fps you got there?

Alpha was really screwed up for me. On i7 920, HD4890, lowest resolution and lowest settings i was getting like 20 constant fps.

Not enough fps to enjoy playing

My desktop has an I7-920 as well, but with HD5850. The alpha loved my desktop and ran 100% smooth even with everything on max, but other people with the same hardware had lags. I don't think you can judge the performance based on the alpha test.

I don't know how HD4890 compares to HD5850?

Posts: 14

30 Mar 2013, 10:24 AMQvazar

Not enough fps to enjoy playing
My desktop has an I7-920 as well, but with HD5850. The alpha loved my desktop and ran 100% smooth even with everything on max, but other people with the same hardware had lags. I don't think you can judge the performance based on the alpha test.

I don't know how HD4890 compares to HD5850?

HD5850 is little bit better, but i since i lowered resolution to something ridiculous like 8XX x 6XX and with all lowest settings it's clear that something is not right there

Would guess it's CPU, but mine is i7 920 @ 3.66Ghz which is decent.

Posts: 1560 | Subs: 1

ATI cards had more issues then Nvidia cards during the alpha btw. That might also be why your performance wasn't good

Posts: 486

30 Mar 2013, 08:50 AMGeneralHell

The alpha wasn't very optimized. Even some players with high end rigs got bad performance I'd await the beta and see how things go. I've heard Quinn Duffy say somewhere that performance has become 2,5x better since the alpha.

I have a rig that run everything I know without any issue (except small lag in Shogun 2 during huge battles on highest settings) and I got 20 FPS, constant spikes and the screen lagged as I moved it. Reminded me of how the Dayz alpha could go down to 20 FPS without lagging at all on high speed internet with a good rig.

Alphas gonna Alpha.

Posts: 1560 | Subs: 1

30 Mar 2013, 16:18 PMRagingJenni

I have a rig that run everything I know without any issue (except small lag in Shogun 2 during huge battles on highest settings) and I got 20 FPS, constant spikes and the screen lagged as I moved it. Reminded me of how the Dayz alpha could go down to 20 FPS without lagging at all on high speed internet with a good rig.

Alphas gonna Alpha.

DayZ/ArmA runs slow because of the way the engine is designed. It simulates everything client-side, rather then server-side. So, you'd need a really good rig to run that game with 30+ FPS.

CoH2 Alpha was just, well, an Alpha. It wasn't optimised yet. So I hope it has improved alot, because I didn't like playing at 20-30 FPS (Even lower in late game).

Posts: 790 | Subs: 2

The alpha ran perfect for me on highest settings on my 2 year old computer, of course I have an nvidia card though.

Posts: 742 | Subs: 2

I didn't have horrid or unplayable lag, but it certainly felt far from smooth. And I hope they've fixed the command lag, it lacked the general 'snappiness' of CoH.