I don't believe pioneer-heavy openings in Coh2 are quite dead, and the nature of the USF/Wehr matchup might be enough resuscitate it. I like playing Wehrmacht in a different way, and I've been having far too much success with this strat not to share it, so here goes...
Step one - build 3 early pioneers to cap the map as quick as possible, complemented by an assault grenadier or other CP 0 unit. Don't take an engagement unless cover is favourable and you can 2v1 an enemy (feel free to facepunch rear echelons if they try to 1v1 you). Flanking assault grens with sprint can allow you to 2v1 more easily, but be wary of taking a bad engagement, your main task is to cap a lot and harass the enemy cutoff. Build bunkers if you're taking a while to get fuel for tech upgrades. Upgrade HQ when you can, you are skipping your first building for now (for now).
Step two - Keep rotating around the map and back-cap where you can. Build your Leichte Mechanized Kompanie as soon as possible and produce and up-gunned scout car. Use it to bully riflemen and eviscerate jeeps for as long as possible but keep it safe, as it can be a very useful tool in killing off halftracks (successfully approach the HT from it's front and you have a good chance to destroy it). Build your infanterie companie soon afterwards to get your first mg and keep your cutoff safe.
Step three - Mgs and mortars will help a great deal against angry US blobber - I usually find myself building two of each. A pak gun will act as added insurance against the HT and/or Stuart tank as you continue to build up a strong position, creeping forward using mortar barrages and aggressive mg positioning. Your pioneers should be constantly active, building, wiring, mining and capping points.
Step four- your call. If you are ahead in fuel, an Ostwind can often finish the game for you. Otherwise get a second pak and go for Stug E (this unit is unbelievable against US infantry if you're lucky enough to possess the commander), or go T4. I know some people don't like panthers - I really do, they are effective when supported and suit my playstyle of shock-tactics. Another strong alternative is to keep stalling for Tiger, but you may find yourself punished by M8A1's/ pack howitzers.
Overview: I've won more games than I've lost using this. The basic premise is to take advantage of the early-game capping weakness of USF and punish them for overextending to cap with one unit. Early AT comes out for the Flack HT/Stuart, and anti-blob mechanisms come out when that starts becoming a problem.
Note:
Loading a halftrack with a panzergren and an assgren/flamer pio can allow you to perform a pretty devastating and unexpected doom-drop on an enemy fighting position or overextended unit. Don't underestimate the morale effect of an early squadwipe in this manner.
Disclaimer - DO NOT USE THIS STRAT ON WINTER MAPS - vps on these maps tend to favour early aggression, which this strat doesn't really provide for.
Thanks for reading, I'd love to hear peoples views on this and any reports they have of using it. I'll continue posting replays in coming weeks.
Edit: Revised and condensed several parts of the strategy
Replaced first replay with a closer game
Replay of a close game:
Utterly bonkers strategy but it just about works
15 Jul 2014, 18:45 PM
#1
1
Posts: 147
28 Jul 2014, 02:34 AM
#2
Posts: 36
This strategy is very good if your are using the mech assault commander. This commander is just incredible against USF because of, well, all the points. I disagree with the pio spam in the opening phase of the game because Assault grenadiers>pioners when it comes to fighting. The mechanised assault group is excellent for quickly decapping points and decrewing weapon teams. The fact that this is a pgren squad without teching up is awesome, because you can upgrade these to deal with that mean AAHT. Furthermore, the StuG E eats riflemen as they were snacks. It can also deal sligjtly with armour because of target weak point, with aid of the pgrens with panzershreck and probably The call-in artilery barrage is really usefull for flushing a defencive position, last act of defiance when a point is being decapped or punishing whatever chooses to stay in the targeted zone. Finally the Tiger is well... A Tiger.
The strategy is solid but lacks in mobility because of the lack of HMG teams that can aid the otherwise weak infantry. Agression therefore is a bloody must.
The strategy is solid but lacks in mobility because of the lack of HMG teams that can aid the otherwise weak infantry. Agression therefore is a bloody must.
28 Jul 2014, 10:09 AM
#3
1
Posts: 147
You're absolutely correct about the effectiveness of the Mechanized commander, I'd just like to address a few points in relation to this strat.
My guiding principle was, what is the most cost effective way for Wehr to deal with USF infantry? A pioneer is the most cost effective way to wreck a rear echelon squad early game (and can fairly easily wipe the squad). Two pioneers will defeat a rifleman with adequate cover movement. An assault grenadier deals with the issue of early buildings and can help a pioneer take out a rifleman squad... You get the idea.
Furthermore, by aggressive capping with pioneers (far from 'lacking mobility') you can straight-up outmaneuver the USF, especially if they're taking their time to pump out vetted riflemen. Plus, if the enemy is clearly blobbing for your cutoff all the time, you can build tier 1 and bring out the mgs, (though I prefer using bunkers).
I realize that Assault grenadiers are more powerful, but they're also more expensive to reinforce, don't scale to late game and are slower to pump out. They're not gonna be your frontline unit, but a flanking force that defeats small groups that engage your pioneers.
With regards to mechanized assault group.... meh. I honestly don't find myself using this too often, as it comes a bit too late (I've usually got a halftrack and a panzergren by the time it's available). StuG E's though... they're utterly brilliant.
Thanks for the comment
My guiding principle was, what is the most cost effective way for Wehr to deal with USF infantry? A pioneer is the most cost effective way to wreck a rear echelon squad early game (and can fairly easily wipe the squad). Two pioneers will defeat a rifleman with adequate cover movement. An assault grenadier deals with the issue of early buildings and can help a pioneer take out a rifleman squad... You get the idea.
Furthermore, by aggressive capping with pioneers (far from 'lacking mobility') you can straight-up outmaneuver the USF, especially if they're taking their time to pump out vetted riflemen. Plus, if the enemy is clearly blobbing for your cutoff all the time, you can build tier 1 and bring out the mgs, (though I prefer using bunkers).
I realize that Assault grenadiers are more powerful, but they're also more expensive to reinforce, don't scale to late game and are slower to pump out. They're not gonna be your frontline unit, but a flanking force that defeats small groups that engage your pioneers.
With regards to mechanized assault group.... meh. I honestly don't find myself using this too often, as it comes a bit too late (I've usually got a halftrack and a panzergren by the time it's available). StuG E's though... they're utterly brilliant.
Thanks for the comment
5 Aug 2014, 05:50 AM
#4
Posts: 1153 | Subs: 1
Could you post a few replays? I'm interested!
I've largely given up on the mechanized assault doctrine. Assault Grens are just a headache for me.
I've largely given up on the mechanized assault doctrine. Assault Grens are just a headache for me.
9 Aug 2014, 02:34 AM
#5
Posts: 71
I'd also like to see some replays; there's a distinct lack of streamers or other sources of information for OST these days.
edit: Also, what on earth can you do if he gets a jeep? It seems like he'd force each of your units to retreat, then rapidly move to the next, using his RE and 2nd through Nth rifle squad to cap.
edit: Also, what on earth can you do if he gets a jeep? It seems like he'd force each of your units to retreat, then rapidly move to the next, using his RE and 2nd through Nth rifle squad to cap.
9 Aug 2014, 18:39 PM
#6
1
Posts: 147
I've updated my post as I've had some time to test and revise some points of the strategy. Rushing an up-gunned scout car proves more effective than rushing for panzergrenadiers, and the halftrack appears less important to build at all. Getting an early MG is also a huge priority, so it comes straight after the scout-car. It is followed up by mortars, my opinion of which has skyrocketed after more playtesting. Two mortars are now practically the core of this strategy. I've changed my view about mechanized assault group too - since I don't build early panzergrenadiers, having them arrive at CP3 is less of an issue and the 250 halftrack offers very useful mobility.
9 Aug 2014, 18:43 PM
#7
1
Posts: 147
Symbol, I assume you are referring to the Dodge, in which case I'd say that unit is the best counter the US have to this strategy. HOWEVER, that doctrine is pretty terrible against standard (i.e. gren-focussed) Wehr play, and as such I rarely end up facing it. Plus, a good assault gren flank that secures a kill on this very squishy unit puts you very far ahead. If you are referring to the M20 utility car, the bazooka-weilding crewmen can be scary but otherwise your scout car (which often arrives before 5 minutes) should mop this up nicely.
9 Aug 2014, 18:53 PM
#8
1
Posts: 147
First replay, hope you enjoy!
SPOILERS BELOW
Points from the video -
After scouting his riflemen with my assault grens I pop sprint to get away without losses before rotating to cap the entire right side of the map.
The scout car arrives at 4:30 and confuses the hell out of my opponent. He then rushes me, only to find I have an mg.
The scout car goes toe-to-toe with an AA halftrack and a bazooka squad before both units retreat with serious damage. The halftrack is unable to aggress me for the rest of the game, my mortars deal it significant damage
The bunker on my fuel keeps my flank and my resources safe, and upon seeing I have an Ostwind my opponent ragequits the game.
9 Aug 2014, 20:32 PM
#9
Posts: 71
I don't think that replay demonstrates much, because that opponent was terrible. He played quite passively and didn't threaten your cutoff, he drove his AAHT the wrong way into your scout car, he doesn't appear to know that US vehicle crews can dismount and repair, he nearly let his AAHT get killed by mortar barrage of all things. On a strategic level, he didn't use his Airborne doctrine choice to skip a tech tier, and for some reason he felt the need to upgrade *three* rifle squads with bazookas to deal with (what he thought as the time was) one scout car.
That said, I think that even with all his mistakes he only lost to his own psyche. At the point where he called you a hurenbock (I learned a new word!) and surrendered, I think he was clearly ahead. The two of you had approximately equal map control, with neither side in danger of being pinned in the base or even cut off. You armies looked like:
USF:
RE
RE
Ambo
MG
AAHT
LT
CPT
Rifle
Rifle
Rifle
Pathfinders
OST:
Pio
Pio
Pio
Pak
Mortar
Mortar
MG
Assault Grens
Scout Car
Ostwind
Despite your tech advantage, his army is just *massively* superior at this point. Due to his bazooka swarm, your scout car is reduced to harassing lone cappers (which, to your credit, you do very effectively), and I think even your ostwind would have trouble inflicting enough casualties to defend itself. One solid push that effectively flanked your MG would shatter you, since you have *one* line infantry squad: the assault grens.
It's also worth noting that at the point the game ends, you've got a decent store of fuel on the way to you next unit (I assume a StuG), but he's floating enough resources to get an AT gun, research grenades, tech major, and build a fuel OP to accelerate his Sherman production, all at once. Alternatively, he could just make a Stuart (in about 15 seconds using his Captain), and since you have no grenadiers to snare it, I think he'd run rampant around your AT gun; I'm not sure how the Ostwind performs against the Stuart, so I could be wrong here.
tl;dr: Your enemy defeated himself. You successfully shocked & awed him into surrender with your Ostwind, but he had the tools to deal with it if only he'd thought a bit. Earlier, he never really tried to contest your half of the map, so I don't think this replay demonstrates that your early game is effective.
That said, I think that even with all his mistakes he only lost to his own psyche. At the point where he called you a hurenbock (I learned a new word!) and surrendered, I think he was clearly ahead. The two of you had approximately equal map control, with neither side in danger of being pinned in the base or even cut off. You armies looked like:
USF:
RE
RE
Ambo
MG
AAHT
LT
CPT
Rifle
Rifle
Rifle
Pathfinders
OST:
Pio
Pio
Pio
Pak
Mortar
Mortar
MG
Assault Grens
Scout Car
Ostwind
Despite your tech advantage, his army is just *massively* superior at this point. Due to his bazooka swarm, your scout car is reduced to harassing lone cappers (which, to your credit, you do very effectively), and I think even your ostwind would have trouble inflicting enough casualties to defend itself. One solid push that effectively flanked your MG would shatter you, since you have *one* line infantry squad: the assault grens.
It's also worth noting that at the point the game ends, you've got a decent store of fuel on the way to you next unit (I assume a StuG), but he's floating enough resources to get an AT gun, research grenades, tech major, and build a fuel OP to accelerate his Sherman production, all at once. Alternatively, he could just make a Stuart (in about 15 seconds using his Captain), and since you have no grenadiers to snare it, I think he'd run rampant around your AT gun; I'm not sure how the Ostwind performs against the Stuart, so I could be wrong here.
tl;dr: Your enemy defeated himself. You successfully shocked & awed him into surrender with your Ostwind, but he had the tools to deal with it if only he'd thought a bit. Earlier, he never really tried to contest your half of the map, so I don't think this replay demonstrates that your early game is effective.
9 Aug 2014, 21:03 PM
#10
1
Posts: 147
I'm really glad you took the time to watch the replay, I'm working on getting better up sharpish, as I understand this guy wasn't exactly top-tier. With regards to the game though, while I may not have had frontline infantry in place, I was in a good spot to start sending panzergrens in 250 halftracks, which in combination with the ostwind and mortar presence would likely allow me to start taking better map control. I could have brought out lmg grens right off the bat as well to build up a bit of an assaulting frontline in combination with flamer pios.
The Stuart is the early unit I'm most scared of, but seeing the early Liutenant tech meant that I didn't need to panic and make sure I had two at guns.
Your final point is interesting. After seeing my centre is clearly defended, the enemy moves to cap the flanks but finds my fuel bunkered, and when he starts taking my VP I am able to push him off with an assault gren and a pioneer. I'm also constantly harrassing his side of the map with a pioneer, though I'm not quite in a position to straight-up take his fuel.
In the end, I still like this replay simply from the reaction I ended up getting from my opponent!
The Stuart is the early unit I'm most scared of, but seeing the early Liutenant tech meant that I didn't need to panic and make sure I had two at guns.
Your final point is interesting. After seeing my centre is clearly defended, the enemy moves to cap the flanks but finds my fuel bunkered, and when he starts taking my VP I am able to push him off with an assault gren and a pioneer. I'm also constantly harrassing his side of the map with a pioneer, though I'm not quite in a position to straight-up take his fuel.
In the end, I still like this replay simply from the reaction I ended up getting from my opponent!
13 Aug 2014, 16:54 PM
#11
Posts: 1153 | Subs: 1
Ostwind will beat a Stuart 1v1. They both have the same caliber gun (but I'm not sure about penetration values) and I would imagine the Stuart having less armor than the Ostwind, and, of course, having a slower rate of fire than the Ostwind. I'm not sure about how they would match up if the Stuart used the stun shots; it would have to depend if the Stuart's rounds penetrated or not.
18 Aug 2014, 18:24 PM
#12
1
Posts: 147
Second replay on a somewhat more challenging map against a better opponent
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
34 | |||||
178 | |||||
13 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
510 users are online:
510 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49061
Welcome our newest member, Rihedcfrd
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Rihedcfrd
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM