Unlike you i use statistics to back my argument. Match maker matches players of Higher skill level. So anyone getting USa W/ ratios will quickly be playing opponents of higher skill.
Even if its not 100% of the time You can see Clearly 90% win ratios for US and the difference in win % does not account for this. Its clear there is Balance issues due to the differences in %
Just finally admitt you enjoy the easy mode OP play that the allied nations bring. I can see you in every thread trying to polish a turd that cant be polished mate.
Inaccurate and biased statistics do not help your case at all.
They would be valid, if CoH2 had a huge playerbase and top players would be matched against other top players on regular basis.
They are not. Better player wins, because he is better and is fighting inferior opponent vast majority of time.
Even tournament games aren't accurate representation of it, because players have to play both/all armies and unless they play them equally, they are always better with one then another.
You even try to discredit VonIvans opinion. The very best player you are friggin talking about here who explains you exactly what I have just said here. These kind of "statistics" and "data" together with everpresent hyperboles are what make you a laughing stock here and your arguments in this thread only add to that pile.
You've made recently one single post that resembled a rational thought, but then you've made this thread and there it all goes.
And if you believe allies are so easy to play, why we don't see you in top 100 for 1v1 with them?
Switch the sides, play it, post a rep/proof that you do and then keep talking. Until that you're just another hardcore fanboy who screams "sov fanboi" at anyone who disagrees with you without even trying to counter argument. You've even did that in this thread against one of the best players for both faction.
How much more biased and transparent with it can you be?