Which ones? Identify them??
You have some very strident views that are frankly unconvincing unless you get into some details, and identify specifics.
For instance, the soviet general staff studies on the build up of the summer 1943 bulge defenses is hardly useless. The Soviet General staff studies were meant to teach operations and tactics to their officers but like a lot of soviet sources, they tend to exaggerate numbers. But the Germans do this aggressively as well. Even the US Army official histories do this, which frequently identify the Germans as incompetents compared to American command. In the end, the numbers are not that important if one is interested in operations, and find it entertaining to read.
As far as your recommendation goes, it sounds like general history to me, and not about specifics of battles. There are only 2 volumes that are about the decisive time on the eastern front, and they are far too short to be detailed at all.
To me, it looks like you are just editorializing; there isn't meat to your claims.
My views on the 'general picture' of the war are pretty standard modern Anglo-saxon views (Ivy league/Oxford historians). I may be 'brainwashed' but I find these stances more convincing than say, those of neo nazis.
With the Germans of our history forum, they have expressed views that are on similar lines but definitively biased towards some sort of nationalism; a deeply ingrained feeling of consistent German military-qualitative supremacy even well into 1944.
This is reinforced by a lack of interest in the US, British/CW, and the Soviet (Russian) side of things.
. In 1944, the war was already decided militarily, and there was no such thing as an equilibrium. On the Eastern front, the RKKA conducted operation Bagration which was quite possibly the worst defeat of German arms in history and effectively destroyed HG Mitte, whereas in France the Wehrmacht proved unable to contain the Western Allies after the latters initial hickup in Normandy. In fact, most people, myself included, would argue that the failure of Unternehmen Taifun in late 1941 (the push to Moscow) sealed the fate of Nazi Germany, quite simply because of the great disparity in manpower and material between Axis and Allies.
Of course, I agree with these statements completely.