Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
Okay, that's 2 graphs. And? This proves what?
Posts: 197
Delete all the shit spawn maps and only play White Ball? Sounds good to me
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Soviets suck balls in 4v4
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
Sorry, I actually played in the last 4v4 tourney and I know for a fact the Sov/Sov/USF/USF comp was the meta. Soviets Maxim build alongside USF airbourne was absolutely insanely good. Even teams not running that comp always had Soviets since their tools are way too valuable to pass up.
On top of that, Soviets are incredibly strong with IL2 bombs, katy, ISU152 and mark target.
I am not even gonna entertain your dumb notion of soviets being bad in 4v4, they are a top 2 faction in every single game mode.
Graph 1: Axis is OP? Maybe the players just suck at playing allies
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Yes maxims with pathfinder sighting is OP. Try it at lower ranks. The enemy will turtle and erase your shit with LeFH. Your team mate will have no recon or drop.
You also will absolutely lose if you go ISU152 at lower ranks. You will have NO ARTY COUNTER. LeFH will erase your army. And try to coordinate your counter with mates who dont speak your language and are monkeys. Relic needs more ping options for COH3.
Uhhh notion? It is stats from TOP 200 player games. Again, 4v4 is not any other game modes. All other modes are a 1v1 situation. I explained why SOV are UP in 4v4 in the earlier posts you did not read. Which is fine. It is a lot of text.
Yes, exactly. Low-Mid tier Allied players suck at the game. So having even matched axis and allied ranks = axis wins. Again, SOV are the worst faction for ELO Hell.
- USF rifleman are trash.
- Brits will turtle and then drop after their forward mortar gets erased.
- Sov are too slow to be effective in 4v4.
See you are finally getting it. Nice!
Posts: 50
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
Because you made it? lol
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
Alright, PM me your login details. I'll put your preferred faction to top 36 4v4 in 2-3 days and then you'll never speak of "ELO hell" ever again.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Isnt that a bannable offense?
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
Didn't know that. I know that now I guess.
I could derank my 4v4 rank of your choice to a low level I guess and then go up to lv18?
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
And I am not saying a top 100 player will get stuck in ELO hell. I am saying mid tier players will hit bad streaks of luck and wind up there. And at that point, skill has nothing to do with rank. It is all random factors you have no control of.
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
I know English is not your native language so let me emphasis it:
skill has nothing to do with rank. It is all random factors you have no control of.
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
If I am immune to ELO hell then the lower ranked dudes you say are in "ELO hell" are simply not good enough to rank higher, therefore there is no ELO hell conspiracy and people just need to git gud.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 50
I know English is not your native language so let me emphasis it:
skill has nothing to do with rank. It is all random factors you have no control of.
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
"60% of the playerbase is stuck in ELO hell"
uhhhhhhhhh
okay yeah goodnight, this is too dumb to argue against.
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
Saying that the factors are random is an argument that is expected to be found at... Well... Random level
Posts: 50
Posts: 2149 | Subs: 2
okay yeah goodnight, this is too dumb to argue against.
 |
|
|
38 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
94 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
