Login

russian armor

What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?

PAGES (8)down
7 Mar 2020, 14:29 PM
#121
avatar of Svalbard SD

Posts: 327



UP with a niche use isn't bad. I actually like the unit, but that doesn't mean I get it all the time in any situation.

I'm pretty sure we're not talking about us - top players/streamers get it most of the time, which makes it far from a niche unit.
7 Mar 2020, 14:30 PM
#122
avatar of Widerstreit

Posts: 1392

Is see:

1. Brummbär is UP as what it should be.
a. make it better, maybe a call-in like King-Tiger and locked to 1 on the field and buff it to KV2 level.
b. change it with StuG E as Commander-Unit and buff StuG E, so Ostheer has a arty-tool with some surviveability.

2. Panther has
a. too less range or (better give StuG G a long-range modus)
b. needs too much pop.

3. Panzerwerfer are good, but
a. arrive too late
b. are no answer to many situations when you need pop to dive in with tanks (you can't because of pop) to counter e.g. other arty. Your Panzerwerfers can't support you in such situations, with some more Pen (like Katjusha) or some light stun effect (like StuG E) they would be more useful versus tanks.


What I think would make Ost more fluent and make T4 better:

All over:
1. Remove critical hit of StuG G, give it a lock-down ability to increase range but can only slowly rotate (like CoH1 Mader)

2a. Make StuG E non-doc, move it into T2 with /tech2 requ. or move it into T3. Buff it (faster shell should be enough) and fix it damage proifile, way too much damage versus buildings.

2b. Make Brummbär a community-unit instead of StuG E. Buff it.

c. Give Panzerwerfer a light stun-effect on vehicles too. (locking turret or such small things)

d. Panther 2 less pop.

etc. my firth opinions...
7 Mar 2020, 18:36 PM
#123
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351

Finally decide what a panther should be: either give it 60 range to make it a tank destroyer or give its cannon anty infantry capabilities so it becomes kind of heavy all rounder.
7 Mar 2020, 20:38 PM
#124
avatar of Svalbard SD

Posts: 327

Or give it switchable AP/HE shells like the Sherman ability? Should be less effective with its HE than the Sherman/Tiger but still be able to do decent work when it faces infantry.
7 Mar 2020, 21:13 PM
#125
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351

Or give it switchable AP/HE shells like the Sherman ability? Should be less effective with its HE than the Sherman/Tiger but still be able to do decent work when it faces infantry.


One of the good options.
7 Mar 2020, 21:42 PM
#126
avatar of Widerstreit

Posts: 1392

Problem, Panther in hull-down is still good. 60 range would be too much, or the effect needs changes.

I am more for reduce pop to 15, because of it bad AI and changig other stuff.

StuG cound need some upgrades to 60 rage. Brummbär is king of confusing etc.
8 Mar 2020, 08:34 AM
#127
avatar of oootto92

Posts: 177

Brumbär rarely sees action in 1v1 due to current shittierT4 meta. In team games in it's current state Brumbär plays most of the time like a brawler because that seems to be what relic tries to make out of it. But it really isn't fit for this role: The time you get Brumbär out enemy has already enough AT out to effectively render it useless as a brawler. It also lacks the armor and health to effectively do this job. You just have to milk overextending infantry to get to that VET1 and still this isn't enough to outrange the AT guns.

My proposition for brumbär would be to make it more like M8 scott, the differences following and being loyal to faction desing:

-Remove brumbär ability to shoot while on the move
-notably increase the firing range mirroring the m8 scott ranges
-decrease armor, health and mobility

This way Brumbär would actually become what it should be: Powerful long range assault gun that can rain down some hurt on pinned enemies and fortified positions. But without clever management and support Allies can snipe it as easily as axis can snipe m8 scotts.
8 Mar 2020, 08:45 AM
#128
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351

Brumbär rarely sees action in 1v1 due to current shittierT4 meta. In team games in it's current state Brumbär plays most of the time like a brawler because that seems to be what relic tries to make out of it. But it really isn't fit for this role: The time you get Brumbär out enemy has already enough AT out to effectively render it useless as a brawler. It also lacks the armor and health to effectively do this job. You just have to milk overextending infantry to get to that VET1 and still this isn't enough to outrange the AT guns.

My proposition for brumbär would be to make it more like M8 scott, the differences following and being loyal to faction desing:

-Remove brumbär ability to shoot while on the move
-notably increase the firing range mirroring the m8 scott ranges
-decrease armor, health and mobility

This way Brumbär would actually become what it should be: Powerful long range assault gun that can rain down some hurt on pinned enemies and fortified positions. But without clever management and support Allies can snipe it as easily as axis can snipe m8 scotts.


Another good option imo :)
8 Mar 2020, 09:20 AM
#129
avatar of Widerstreit

Posts: 1392

...


Problem is, that should be the role of StuG E, not of Brummbär.

Edit: not to destroy the hole unit situation, I think best would be to make Brummbär exclusive instead of StuG E.
8 Mar 2020, 09:40 AM
#130
avatar of Toxicfirebal

Posts: 66

Or give it switchable AP/HE shells like the Sherman ability? Should be less effective with its HE than the Sherman/Tiger but still be able to do decent work when it faces infantry.


While that would make panther (finally) viable in 1v1 , 4v4 teamgame panther spam will become more cancerous than it already is. I was thinking making the panther upgraded Mg stronger or put the HE rounds under vet?
8 Mar 2020, 09:43 AM
#131
avatar of Toxicfirebal

Posts: 66



Problem is, that should be the role of StuG E, not of Brummbär.

Edit: not to destroy the hole unit situation, I think best would be to make Brummbär exclusive instead of StuG E.

Would the Stug E than be in T3 or 4?
8 Mar 2020, 09:45 AM
#132
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


Would the Stug E than be in T3 or 4?

A viable solution would be:
Stug-E at T3
OStwind to T4 with a price reduction so that is cheaper than T-34/76

Brumbar to doctrines redesigned as KV-2

That would provide Ostheer with:
Some T3 indirect fire support which they lack after the mortar nerfs
Make skipping T3 viable with Ostwind
Add a different Super heavy to Ostheer.
8 Mar 2020, 10:06 AM
#134
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

Finally decide what a panther should be: either give it 60 range to make it a tank destroyer or give its cannon anty infantry capabilities so it becomes kind of heavy all rounder.


Neither, give it more accuracy so it can actually hit the target and it’s fine.
8 Mar 2020, 10:12 AM
#135
avatar of Sgt.BigHead

Posts: 65

Ost most balanced faction in coh 2 in my opinion. Real problem is other factions more rewarding and easy to play with. Ostheer try to counter every allied unit with different ostheer unit.

At his current state if we need the buff T4 , Ostheer is combined arms faction. we can give T4 inf to some kind of defensive or offensive buff when inf aprox with any support weapon esp mg42...

In team games ostheer struggles mostly indirect attacks and allied Lmg infantry, maybe we can buff survivability againts those items.

About T4 armor its just long range TD's playground in team games. Its too complicated when there will be any buff or nerf going to happen for any faction late game armors.

But maybe damage increase would be good for panther against mediums.
8 Mar 2020, 10:18 AM
#137
avatar of Widerstreit

Posts: 1392

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 09:45 AMVipper

A viable solution would be:
Stug-E at T3
OStwind to T4 with a price reduction so that is cheaper than T-34/76

Brumbar to doctrines redesigned as KV-2

That would provide Ostheer with:
Some T3 indirect fire support which they lack after the mortar nerfs
Make skipping T3 viable with Ostwind
Add a different Super heavy to Ostheer.


+1
8 Mar 2020, 11:22 AM
#138
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351



Neither, give it more accuracy so it can actually hit the target and it’s fine.


Another good idea.
8 Mar 2020, 11:37 AM
#139
avatar of Widerstreit

Posts: 1392



Neither, give it more accuracy so it can actually hit the target and it’s fine.


Why not use the hole question to fix more? Line-up problems and bad commander and commander-units? Don't waist the situation.
8 Mar 2020, 11:39 AM
#140
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3



Why not use the hole question to fix more? Line-up problems and bad commander and commander-units? Don't waist the situation.


Because Vipper's "fix" is abhorrent.

Also because Relic won't allow large changes.
PAGES (8)down
0 user is browsing this thread:

Livestreams

unknown 51
United States 34
United States 19
unknown 8

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

854 users are online: 854 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49122
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM