Login

russian armor

Are they not fixing heavies?

11 Feb 2020, 02:07 AM
#101
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Feb 2020, 01:07 AMmrgame2


Ooh is that insider tips?
V1.1 still about delays.

If so, i guess axis is getting screwed again since mod team is insistence on not touching 60td.



No, i'm talking about the bugs that are current in live regarding their AoE performance. They are slightly better than they should.
11 Feb 2020, 03:21 AM
#102
avatar of Reverb

Posts: 318



Sounds like a well coordinated assault. Perhaps you could learn from it instead of bitching about balance.


Whats to learn? I explained what you do with that doc. It's super brainless.
11 Feb 2020, 09:01 AM
#104
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1



Sounds like a well coordinated assault. Perhaps you could learn from it instead of bitching about balance.


Giving to a unit a specific counter to its own counter is dumb, no wonder why it ends on OKW hands since this faction get all the stupidest design units and abilities for the sake of making it fun to play.

Balance comes always after when we talk about OKW.
11 Feb 2020, 16:55 PM
#105
avatar of miragefla
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Feb 2020, 20:46 PMLago




The proposed profile seems like a tradeoff relative to the Panzer IV rather than an improvement over it: much less wipey, but perhaps more consistent over several shots.

What's the case against just giving it the Panzer IV's AoE profile?


Because the Tiger still hits you from a further range resulting in less scatter on top of already having a lower scatter value. This means the tank is more likely to hit in general particularly versus clumped units with a high chance of sniping model on direct hits to begin with. The Tiger also has a fast rate of fire on top of a larger AOE in general.
11 Feb 2020, 17:06 PM
#106
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Because the Tiger still hits you from a further range resulting in less scatter on top of already having a lower scatter value. This means the tank is more likely to hit in general particularly versus clumped units with a high chance of sniping model on direct hits to begin with. The Tiger also has a fast rate of fire on top of a larger AOE in general.


That makes sense.

In that case, assuming I understand it, the new AoE looks like a good solution. It should make a pair of P4s substantially better against infantry than a single Tiger.
11 Feb 2020, 20:17 PM
#107
avatar of JibberJabberJobber

Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3

Or just remove some utility from kpen offensive. The arty + sight tank commander punishes AT gun play too much when against tiger.
13 Feb 2020, 06:24 AM
#108
avatar of CODGUY

Posts: 888

Personally I like where all the heavies are at now. I think the Tiger I, Pershing, and IS2 are in the best spot. CP13 was way too far out in 1v1 games for these things to be useful. You'd call one in just to kill your opponent's base after you'd already.
16 Feb 2020, 06:55 AM
#109
avatar of AutobahnBisquick

Posts: 17 | Subs: 1

Honestly just get rid of heavies. Keep them as fun set pieces for singleplayer, but they don't belong in ranked 1v1 in this state. They are a one unit solution to every problem in the game, REDUCING the tactical depth. Honestly, I'm not coming back to the game until heavies are either SEVERELY nerfed or are out entirely.
16 Feb 2020, 18:40 PM
#110
avatar of Reverb

Posts: 318

k...keep me posted
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

849 users are online: 849 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49104
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM