Login

russian armor

For Balance Review Team

by PlayerX 18th December 2017, 19:50 PM
  • [00:04:37] Tahku: yes
  • [00:04:40] Tahku: ur name is correct
  • [00:04:42] Tahku: L2P
  • [00:13:39] [L2P]IIPLIICaptainSPrice: L2P
  • [00:21:21] Tahku: ?
  • [00:24:26] Tahku: noob
  • [00:27:43] Tahku: lel
  • [00:27:45] Tahku: stug spam
  • [00:27:54] Tahku: easy counter
  • [00:27:58] Tahku: but u make game longer
  • [00:27:59] [L2P]IIPLIICaptainSPrice: L2P
  • [00:28:07] Tahku: yes u should
  • [00:30:00] [L2P]IIPLIICaptainSPrice: p u s s y brit
  • [00:30:06] Tahku: stug noob
  • [00:32:01] Tahku: this works once
  • [00:32:02] Tahku: gg
  • [00:32:05] Tahku: try agian
  • [00:32:06] Tahku: pls
  • [00:32:08] [L2P]IIPLIICaptainSPrice: L2P
Honor
Honor it
0
Chat
Show Chat
Patch: 3.0.0.21748
Duration: 00:32:09
18 Dec 2017, 19:50 PM
#1
avatar of PlayerX

Posts: 25

I post this replay just to show some issue I feel Brits vs Ostheer

I think no snare and bad piat make Stug Spam too good vs Brits

Stug is too cost effective vs faction with no snare and no Infantry Anti-tank that is usuable

I hope Balance team review this replay see what I mean, also make Piat stonger or maybe reduce Rate Fire on Stug

Mainly I don't think this is Stug OP but more Brits need better Infantry Anti Tank or snare.

I suggest just make Piat like Bazooka USF and I think it will be ok.

Thanks
18 Dec 2017, 19:55 PM
#2
avatar of Nosliw

Posts: 515

AT guns? Firefly? Flanking?
18 Dec 2017, 20:11 PM
#3
avatar of PlayerX

Posts: 25

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Dec 2017, 19:55 PMNosliw
AT guns? Firefly? Flanking?



You not understand. Issue of this tank is too cheap and too spammable. Cheap spammable is easy counter with Snare and AT gun, but since brit No snare AT gun cannot be used to kill Stug, only used to defend small area

Firefly is NERF in patch, cost almost 2x more fuel, and more manpower, and has much less Rate of Fire. It is not suitable counter for Stug.

Counter for stug is Snare + AT gun OR Infantry AT.

The player here understand this why he make them.

This issue need address
Thanks
18 Dec 2017, 23:14 PM
#5
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Dec 2017, 20:11 PMPlayerX


Firefly is NERF in patch, cost almost 2x more fuel, and more manpower, and has much less Rate of Fire. It is not suitable counter for Stug.


Firefly

Due to the Firefly's range and accuracy, when combined with the Comet or when multiple Firefly's are fielded, this combination of tank power can prove to be overly dominate (primarily in team games). To compensate, the following changes have been made:

Accuracy from 0.08/0.07/0.05 to 0.06/0.05/0.4
Moving accuracy from 0.75 to 0.55
Tulips no longer cancels move commands upon stun when hit
Tulips now deal 33% damage versus infantry.
Vet 3 damage bonus reduced from +80 to +40

interesting how you come to the fuel thing
19 Dec 2017, 18:19 PM
#7
avatar of PlayerX

Posts: 25



Firefly

Due to the Firefly's range and accuracy, when combined with the Comet or when multiple Firefly's are fielded, this combination of tank power can prove to be overly dominate (primarily in team games). To compensate, the following changes have been made:

Accuracy from 0.08/0.07/0.05 to 0.06/0.05/0.4
Moving accuracy from 0.75 to 0.55
Tulips no longer cancels move commands upon stun when hit
Tulips now deal 33% damage versus infantry.
Vet 3 damage bonus reduced from +80 to +40

interesting how you come to the fuel thing


As explained, Firefly Nerf b/c it is strong in 2v2 / 3v3/ etc

In 1v1 Firefly is tank only good for certain situations (tiger/King Tiger) and with nerf it will be even worse in 1v1. It is not counter to stug b/c Stug is much more cost effective than Firefly, so making somehting less cost effective to counter something more cost effective does not make any sense ?

What is needed is 1) Stug ROF nerf and buff to pintle mounted MG so it is like maybe AEC vs infantry instead complete worthless vs infantry

2) make Piat = bazooka so they can be usable instead of now completly worthless why you never see in game.
19 Dec 2017, 19:13 PM
#8
avatar of Luciano

Posts: 712

Jack pls, stop crying
19 Dec 2017, 19:49 PM
#9
19 Dec 2017, 21:01 PM
#10
avatar of PlayerX

Posts: 25

Every good player know Stug is too cost effective if micro well. If you want to acknowledge you are noob, feel free to make comment otherwise.

DonnieChan now Confirmed Noob MVGame
19 Dec 2017, 22:11 PM
#11
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
I agree with him, brit in 1v1 have snare problem and stug problem too.
20 Dec 2017, 01:07 AM
#12
avatar of Luciano

Posts: 712

i agree too but he is not crying because he really cares about balance, he talks about that because its the only faction he plays and he has like a billion games played only with brits
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

900 users are online: 1 member and 899 guests
FK9DD
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49432
Welcome our newest member, weekprophecy
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM