Nice game vs paul and gdot(?)
Axis 2 stronk, lefh 2op
RIP pitts
ggwp !
![:bananadance: :bananadance:](/images/Smileys/sFun_bananadance.gif)
![FI](/images/flags/flags-iso/24/FI.png)
![:bananadance: :bananadance:](/images/Smileys/sFun_bananadance.gif)
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
Posts: 200 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedPosts: 1166 | Subs: 1
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
nicepostnicepostnicepostnicepost
not us though - did you post the one olf you vs hans + random? MingLee
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Well we know it is Paul plus some one else, all the (admittedly circumstantial) evidence points to you.
Shame Allies got rocked though on such an Allied favored map, or so you've said.
I think the map is pretty balanced actually, if there was no silly elevation shenanigans it would be one of my favorites.
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
I did not saw the game hans+ random vs them but i can see that Talisman and Tüme had 0,29 K/D vs them.
So it seems to be a worse game
@ Tüme since when you are playing OKW?^^ I only see you playing Wehr
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
And the reason why i play quite alot double okw nowdays, is just okw can handle much more casualties, than ostheer, when its very likely play vs calliope,matress,usf mortars etc. ostheer just cant handle that shit so well. Tho, okw, not so good imo vs soviet. ostheer always > okw vs soviet
Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1
Well we know it is Paul plus some one else, all the (admittedly circumstantial) evidence points to you.
Shame Allies got rocked though on such an Allied favored map, or so you've said.
I think the map is pretty balanced actually, if there was no silly elevation shenanigans it would be one of my favorites.
Posts: 558 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
Stop with the witch hunt. I only have a single account. You have no evidence. I beat you all the time on my main. Yes the map is solid and the elevation changes are annoying.
Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1
I respect Tume and Talisman so I won't pursue anything that would ruin their thread when we could just PM about it. But please don't lie. I can't remember a single instance of you beating me in 1s or 2s. Although I don't think you really play 1s. Maybe in like a 4v4 tournament you won once against me?
And don't pretend that we don't all know that the account's are your buddy Paula's. Surprised his new coh2.org account (namnamnam) hasn't been pride post spamming.
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
Sounds like a bad case of loser-denial. Too much Halloween candy can rot your brain.
Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1
Eh I stand corrected then. Quite sure the record is at least 90:10 in my favor though. We can always set up some friendly (or money) matches to test if you want. To be fair I said i couldn't remember you winning, not that it had never happened. Just a rare occurrence so it doesn't stand out in my memory.
Your Halloween candy comment is really dumb by the way. Especially considering that I haven't eaten any Halloween candy in a few years. Really just doesn't make sense at all though. Gotta wait till I have some kids that go out and get free candy so I can steal a few pieces of theirs
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
"quite sure", candyman?
https://www.coh2.org/replay/57337/memory-loss-is-a-serious-issue
Posts: 1166 | Subs: 1
Yes sir. Probably close to 90% win rate in my favor.
You have two examples, congratulations. I rarely, if ever, save replays of beating you because it's easy (read: you're bad).
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
Spicy
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
17 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
16 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
9 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |