full abuse

Just some dude going full abuse and lose. only to blame the map

i didn't play well and i don't think i'm a good player, but i felt like this guy was just. idk...


anyway if you guys want to give me feed back please leave messages.

I'll take constructive critizism, and learn.

I didnt watch the replay, but can you tell me what do u mean by full abuse?

I didnt watch the replay, but can you tell me what do u mean by full abuse?

USF went double mortar, into rifles spam and try to 1-a to victory.
m-10 spam to crush and take out tanks.

mind you i didn't play well (i played like ass). and was seriously considering throwing, which i nearly did, but i picked myself up and decided to trying to win it.

the dude did do a couple things interesting, demos. but that is all, and was expected with them assengie. but i was tilted and didn't pay attention (or cared).


think what really bothered me though is when as bad as this USF player was, he blamed it on the map instead of questioning his own decisions.
It's like cutting your grass only getting half the yard done and then blaming the yard for being to big.

Did you actually watch the replay cause it kinda contradicts what you describe.

USF went double mortar, into rifles spam and try to 1-a to victory.
m-10 spam to crush and take out tanks.

His starting build order was 3 rifles, morter, captain, engie, engie, stuart.
At no stage did he ever have 2 morters or any more than 3 rifles.
For the first 20 mins the army size of each player is similiar, and after 20 min usf is almost always trailing.

wtf does "1-a to victory" mean?

M10 Spam ? He never had more than 1 M10 on the field at any given time.
Futhermore, if he did not callin M10 when he did the game was over.

If he teched and built shermans and replaced his sherman every time he lost it, would that be spam????

mind you i didn't play well (i played like ass). and was seriously considering throwing, which i nearly did, but i picked myself up and decided to trying to win it.

the dude did do a couple things interesting, demos. but that is all, and was expected with them assengie. but i was tilted and didn't pay attention (or cared).

You ask for advice but state you don't care????

think what really bothered me though is when as bad as this USF player was, he blamed it on the map instead of questioning his own decisions.
It's like cutting your grass only getting half the yard done and then blaming the yard for being to big.

There no chat in the replay.

You seem to have some resentment towards USF, given the number of incorrect statements you made regarding your opponent, so my advice is go play usf, learn their strengths and weakness which in turn will improve you OKW play.

stuff

Yes i did watch the replay.
he had spammed m-10s, stating he kept on calling them in. and throwing them away.
he did build 2 mortars,
I do know what he had.

1-a to victory, is a term where people control group the entire army to 1, then a is attack to victory describing launching the control group.

the dude didn't seem to tech to shermans but used a call in bulldozer sherman.

I did ask for advice yes, and i was stating at that time i didn't care what i was paying attention to, i'll try to type in a more proper of a format in the future for you to understand since it's seemingly hard for you to understand what i say as it is anyway.

He started chatting up the storm after victory screen. after victory screen chat and the game is not recorded.

I don't resent USF, i enjoy USF every time i play them.
I was asking if there maybe was a little something other that may have been done.


Also thanks for providing me with nothing really solid, as this isn't what i was looking for when i was asking for any advice. I was more going with what would you have done. but i doubt you'd follow up with that with the last post considering how salty you were or, it seems that you were. and if you weren't it felt kind of abrasive with the amount of quotations that had been used. and with the utmost assumptions of what i was implying.

He built two mortars because you took one of them, and could have taken the second. He never had more than 1 M10 on the field and in that case would have done better with Jackson. No cheesy strats there, just bad ones.

You could have won that match at like the 17 minute mark if you had not thrown you P4 into their base for no reason. And when you got that P4 you could instead have afforded the Panther which would have been a better choice to kill M10's. You were already dominating his infantry.

But nothing abusing about how the US plays except throwing units into pointless fights and losing vehicles.

If I can give you some advice, you lost your P4 because you overextended it, your replacement Jpz4 was lost because you moved it into the fuel point unsupported for seemingly no reason, you kept moving your Raketens forward in front of your infantry and having to retreat them allowing the enemy vehicles to do stuff that wasn't exploding.

You let an AT gun shoot at your Schwerer Panzer HQ for a long while before trying to stop it at which point it was too late. Your second Panzer HQ was destroyed as you let them pound on it for ages before moving in to help it.

Your infantry combat went well, you wiped a lot of rifleman and like 2 captains along with getting the US mortar twice, though the second time you did not steal it.

Stuff

Thanks for the solid reply. I guess i was on full tilt for no reason. I never thought of getting a panther. I'll also try to keep note on what is going on better.

Actually the guy lost a bulldozer sherman + some more stuff both times he destroyed the panzer HQ, so just in terms of resources that more than evens it out. I tend to make that mistake of committing P4s against Stuarts as well. As soon as there is any other form of AT around it goes badly with the stun shot, the stuart is durable and fast enough to escape most of the time. JP4 I don't think is a good choice on this map. Due to all the shot and sight blockers the M10s will be superior. I understand your frustration with the M10 crush ability... it is ridiculous.