Login

russian armor

Para vs USA how could this happen

by Para 13th September 2014, 09:50 AM
Minsk Pocket (4)
Minsk Pocket
  • [00:00:07] Para: oh..
  • [00:00:09] Para: crap..
  • [00:00:15] USA: gl hf
  • [00:00:21] Para: gl hf
Honor
Honor it
7
Chat
Show Chat
Patch: 3.0.0.15318
Duration: 00:46:21
13 Sep 2014, 09:50 AM
#1
avatar of Para

Posts: 103

lol
13 Sep 2014, 12:54 PM
#2
avatar of The Shape

Posts: 475

Holy crapola. That was insane. Best comeback ever.

This game shows you exactly how good OKW is when played with uber mind. How can he win with only a tiny fraction of the map....lol.

The key to losing in my opinion was wasting the shermans 1on1 a few times. They needed to go around everything and just wipe all his trucks. The Flak Truck was just about dead and all it needed was 1-2 more hits. Also...why give him the m20 for no reason? Could have layed some mines over there and possibly immobilized his KT.

All in all...I think Para got overconfident. The way USA was playing you could have spammed 2 mini howies and killed so much but you never made even 1. Had you taken the Priest doctrine instead might have also served better. I'm not sure what the airbourne gave you that was useful besides the p47 runs which obviously didn't kill him. He was hurt badly at one point but dang....1 VP....wow.
13 Sep 2014, 22:04 PM
#3
avatar of atr3uh

Posts: 1090 | Subs: 1

13 Sep 2014, 22:41 PM
#4
avatar of -HOI-PauL.a.D
Donator 11

Posts: 1341 | Subs: 6

I must say wow VET 5 PAK 43
14 Sep 2014, 09:30 AM
#5
avatar of Schaf85

Posts: 1

Holy shit that was amazing.

Yeah the whole time I'm screaming for the USA to use arty.
14 Sep 2014, 12:17 PM
#6
avatar of Bulgakov

Posts: 987

Holy crapola. That was insane. Best comeback ever.

This game shows you exactly how good OKW is when played with uber mind. How can he win with only a tiny fraction of the map....lol.



I think it shows how weak OKW is since there was an "uber-mind" commanding them but has only a tiny fraction of the map.

Great game though.
14 Sep 2014, 13:44 PM
#7
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21



I think it shows how weak OKW is since there was an "uber-mind" commanding them but has only a tiny fraction of the map.

Great game though.

Yet he was able to win the game with simply a fraction of the map as OKW. Which makes your statement invalid. Imagine if he had at least half the map as OKW, bet it would hurt more. OKW is the strongest faction atm.

It was nice to see OMGPOP's defensive play-style, as he is usually 100% aggressive. Think the biggest problem here, other than the lack of arty due to doctrine choice, was the fact that Para piece-mealed all his tanks instead of building up a big force to send in and finish the game.
14 Sep 2014, 16:35 PM
#8
avatar of Bulgakov

Posts: 987

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2014, 13:44 PMVonIvan

Yet he was able to win the game with simply a fraction of the map as OKW. Which makes your statement invalid. Imagine if he had at least half the map as OKW, bet it would hurt more. OKW is the strongest faction atm.

It was nice to see OMGPOP's defensive play-style, as he is usually 100% aggressive. Think the biggest problem here, other than the lack of arty due to doctrine choice, was the fact that Para piece-mealed all his tanks instead of building up a big force to send in and finish the game.



You might be right. Still, every faction can have a come-back. The fact that he lost so much map control despite being a top player also suggests that OKW is not as powerful as you're claiming. My statement isn't "invalid", it's just not possible to prove it (or the opposite opinion) with this replay.

I can agree the comeback suggests the opposite though.
15 Sep 2014, 06:25 AM
#9
avatar of Penetralia13

Posts: 124

why did u abandon that m20? :D lol
15 Sep 2014, 07:53 AM
#10
avatar of Spearhead

Posts: 162

So that's how a top then player does it?
What a fkn disgrace.

You could train a monkey to do that.
16 Sep 2014, 09:22 AM
#11
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

I often think people cut their own throat by spamming m8a, in this case you cut your own throat by not getting it. A single m8a would give you the auto barrage feature at 60 range to kill the infantry around the center vp and would give you the barrage ability to harass his ats and pak43 from 80 range.
16 Sep 2014, 09:23 AM
#12
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

16 Sep 2014, 09:39 AM
#13
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896




You might be right. Still, every faction can have a come-back. The fact that he lost so much map control despite being a top player also suggests that OKW is not as powerful as you're claiming. My statement isn't "invalid", it's just not possible to prove it (or the opposite opinion) with this replay.

I can agree the comeback suggests the opposite though.

USA lost so much map control because of mistakes he did early in the game including 1. keeping his kubel unsupported at the same spot for too long 2. losing his puma to a mine 3. and losing his hq building so early. On the other hand Para gave him the win by not getting the m8a and constantly rushing and losing his tanks.


edit: sorry I clicked report by mistake on one of the comments
16 Sep 2014, 10:28 AM
#14
avatar of Bulgakov

Posts: 987

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Sep 2014, 09:39 AMAbdul

USA lost so much map control because of mistakes he did early in the game including 1. keeping his kubel unsupported at the same spot for too long 2. losing his puma to a mine 3. and losing his hq building so early. On the other hand Para gave him the win by not getting the m8a and constantly rushing and losing his tanks.


edit: sorry I clicked report by mistake on one of the comments


Yeah I guess that's true. This really isn't the replay to base balance discussions on with all the mistakes. And USA was floating around 1000MP for a while.

I also though a pack howitzer or two and the stuart mortar thing with an AT gun would have let him destroy the flak in the middle and take the game easily.


USF player also built 7 munitions caches? Obviously OKW is OP if they can defeat 7 fuel caches!:P
16 Sep 2014, 14:08 PM
#15
avatar of Para

Posts: 103

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Sep 2014, 09:22 AMAbdul
I often think people cut their own throat by spamming m8a, in this case you cut your own throat by not getting it. A single m8a would give you the auto barrage feature at 60 range to kill the infantry around the center vp and would give you the barrage ability to harass his ats and pak43 from 80 range.


I do agree with m8a, I really needed it. and airborne commander was bad choice.

16 Sep 2014, 15:02 PM
#16
avatar of atr3uh

Posts: 1090 | Subs: 1

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

651 users are online: 651 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM