Great, but hey, there is a problem. It seems that moderators are overreacting quite often deleting posts in which members are actualy not flaming, not trolling, not insulting. It seems they don't even bother to read them. Aparently they are just basing on "report" button and invise posts because some retard pushed that button without a good reason. This "deleting posts" power must come with reason and judgement! Which is why I would ask from them a more objective approach. If a guy "flamed", "trolled" or whatever before, it doesn't mean he cannot comply to these rules and it's frustrating when one is judged not by what he actually wrote in that post but by how everybody generally (including Moderator) thinks about him. That is not MODERATION. That is BIAS.
If your other posts are about as level-headed and sensible as this one, SSHeini, then the moderators were totally justified in deleting them. Simultaneously claiming that you're not insulting anyone and calling people "retards" doesn't give a good impression.