If we want to start a circle jerk about our ranks to prove our points: I´m/was level 1-30 in 2vs2s with all factions some time ago (I quit playing Germans as I reached a -8 loss streak). I will gladly inform you Brits are batshit OP. All that could be seen were unwarranted lines like "get gud" from cocky Brit players. So I got good by playing Brits exclusively and I´m now on a +18 streak. Wow, I really got good. All I had to do was change the faction.
Has nothing to do with my ranks, but since the guy I quoted suggests the guy he was replying to is a low level player, while being exactly that him self. At least Aronin wrote something potentially useful, while ullumulu pretty much just cried about "op stuff" (like the majority of his posts).
Interesting you brought up streaks, since its not really evidence that anything is strong or not because it could quite easily go either way - there are far too many variables over a short period of time.
Using your logic I can assume OKW is over performing since its my highest streak right?
Lets use Luvnest as an example. He has a +1 streak with Brits, yet +17 as soviet. If Brits are "batshit OP" what does that make Soviets?
Jove has a variety of streak ranges, yet Brits are not the highest and are almost the same as Ost and OKW. Does that make them just as OP?
You can inform me of whatever you like, but it doesn't really mean much to me when you have 4.6:1 of axis:allied games.
I mean you come out with stuff like:
A Vet 3 maxim will have better vet 3 than an MG34.
Unlocks the 'Sprint' ability
+20% suppression, +30% weapon rotation speed
+30% accuracy, +20% burst duration, +10% weapon rotation speed
Unlocks the ' Incendiary Armor Piercing Rounds' ability
+20% suppression, +30% weapon rotation speed
+30% accuracy, +20% burst rate of fire, +10% weapon rotation speed
They have the exact same vet bonuses.