Profile of Burts

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1702

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Burts5556
Steam: 76561198033352922


Thread: new content coming?10 Aug 2014, 20:55 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2014, 20:45 PMsea peasant yea because a jagdpanzer hits as hard as a jackson, or has as much range. get real. Yes a jagpanzer has the same range as the jackson. Doesnt have the same damage but is alot more durable. In: Lobby
Thread: new content coming?10 Aug 2014, 19:40 PM I don't understand why people cry about M26+ jackson breaking the game. Oh noes, i bet the game is already broken as hell. tiger + jagpanzer. Oh my GOD UNCOUNTERABLE!!!! Is-2 + su-85 or jackson OH SHIT GG wp lol stupid no skill no brainer 2 unit uncuounterable unit combo. M26 pershing would not break the game. And relic said that they WILL give the community what they want, so really, i am pretty sure that the PERSHING WILL eventually make it into the game. So what if 20 pershings only ever saw combat. Only 44 ostwinds were ever built, who knows how much ever saw combat , if any, 250 pershings were deployed to the western front. A pershing would probaly be slightly stronger than a tiger armor and damage wise, however not as strong as IS-2. In: Lobby
Thread: new content coming?10 Aug 2014, 14:21 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2014, 13:07 PMKatitof And that was a crushing letdown for me and quite a few others as unique eastern front feel went down to shitter. Last thing I want to see is unique feel of armies go the same route. Also, there is a quote on the blog stating specifically there will be no pershing or chaffee, but they have use their engine sounds for OKW vehicles. I too was a little dissapointed when WFA was announced. I would of much preffered simply another soviet faction and another german faction. In: Lobby
Thread: m-42 mini at gun needs some love9 Aug 2014, 09:35 AM Okay, so this at gun, is REALLY underwhelming in my opinion. I mean it's got low penetration, 100/80/60 for close, mid and long range respectively and very low damage (80). I feel that it's a really bad at gun for 200mp, it has no outstanding capabilities, and both raketenwerfer and 57mm at gun costs just 70mp more, yet are so much more better. I feel that buffing it's penetration to 120/100/80 and a damage buff to 120 or maybe 100 would be good. Or maybe justs one of these two, i don't know really. Another option would be to give it some kind of stun ability, that temporarily stuns tanks. I mean the m-42 wasn't really that bad of an AT gun, it was capable of 51mm of armor penetration at 1000m, so just enough to penetrate the panzer IV and panzer III. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: That Dodge8 Aug 2014, 20:34 PM I fear that the mechanized doctrine will suffer the same fate as the "community defensive tactics" for the soviets, first the dushka was 0 CP, then it got upped to 1 CP, making it pretty much useless, and then it got hit by the final nail in the coffin, it was moved to 2 cps. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Any sneaky changes about Shocks?8 Aug 2014, 12:18 PM Okay, so obersoldaten cost 400mp, are effective at all ranges vs infantry. Shocks are 390mp and are only effective at CLOSE range vs infantry. Shocks op??? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My proposal to making USF more appealing 8 Aug 2014, 09:42 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2014, 03:06 AMRogers Pershing for the last time is a no, and will not and should not happen. Here is one of the small reasons why. Imagine. M26 pershing in front, Jacksons in the back with HVAP. Guess what? Axis lose every single game, ever. Axis heavy tanks already get raped and rightfully so by vet jacksons even their front armor is no match. There is a reason the Pershing will never be in Western Fronts because it has no place in the Army design. Relic has said there will never be a pershing and I fully agree with them. There are other avenues to take. Except that that is allready possible. IS 2 with jacksons behind. IS2 with su-85s behind. Oh noes, how horrible! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Cruzz's Fantasy Patch Thread 2: WTFWFA Edition8 Aug 2014, 07:48 AM I think the soviet mini at gun needs some love. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Cruzz's Fantasy Patch Thread 2: WTFWFA Edition7 Aug 2014, 12:34 PM Yes , all of the suggestions are good, well thought out and just flat out everywhere pure on full on super fleshed out good amazing spectacular. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance issues currently facing the game7 Aug 2014, 08:15 AM Are people seriously taking this post seriously? His posts clearly show that he has 1. Very little knowledge or experience about the game. 2. Plays only the axis faction (s). In: COH2 Balance