Profile of Australian Magic

I was facing a way more experiend player in 1v1 than me.
Still, I think I did really well.
But... 1 Obers squad fighting equally 2 paras squads... Vetted stormpios killing vetted paras with LMGs, bouncing shells from "side armor" of Jadgpanzer.

I think the crucial moment was in 41min when I tried to flank Jadgpanzer (thanks Relic for awesome pathfinding on right-side Jackson ) and 5sec LAG (again, thanks relic!) 41:30 by which I have lost 2 scotts

At that moment OKW player took advantage I could not do anything I think, in fact I lost all hope and gave up.

But like I sad... Vet 3, damaged, 3 models left Stormpios killing vet 3 Paras with LMG at mid range.... Insane... (56:50 I guess).

I think it's true that if you won't win by 25-30min against OKW then it's GG.

So, what I did wrong?

A Jagdpanzer to counter a Scott? Seriously, do you really think any semi-competent player is gonna give you LOS on his Scott? The beauty of the Scott, being an artillery vehicle, is that you can park it behind shotblockers...and its not like you can make an offensive move with a JP.
That said, I don't think the Scott is gamebreaking. Yes it gets the occasional annoying squadwipe, but not to the extent that it would be out of all proportion. I reckon in 9 out of 10 situations the Sherman represents a better investment.

Move your units to force scott to get out from the shotblockers.

Just make second weapon icon under squad icon.
Since all squads can wield 2 weapons (right?) it should be reflected under squad icon like: flamethrower icon and BAR icon under it, or 2 zooks icons...

how do you let a sherman eat more than one volley from the blob.

edit: did some math, comparing zookas to shreks in their performance against each medium armor. we've got shreks vs shermans, and zookas vs panzer 4s

Shreks time to kill a sherman (shrek has 100% penetration vs sherman armor at all ranges) is 51 seconds. Zookas time to kill a panzer 4 is 55 seconds (zookas chance to penetrate varies from 64% at max range, and 77% at the closest range against frontal armor). Bazookas cost 60 munitions, and wehr shreks cost 60 munitions, and okw shreks cost 108 munitions if you factor in the munitions penalty.

That's theory, but what about practice? Well...
You counted OKW schreck with lower ammo income, so why you did not count MP and F cost for zooks?
Schreck -> 54s



Bazooka -> 99s

OKW is broken but only about long range DPS.
LMG34 + Obers veterancy = terminator.
Cons+34, rifles with 34... This weapon is insane.
None unit should be way stronger than Grens with LMG. There was a time before WFA when we were complaining how OP grens with LMG are. WFA has proved we were wrong
Rifles should have limit for LMG (1 per squad), same for Paras but Obers have to toned down to 14-17 far DPS.
Falsch should not be better at far range than Grens.
Change their DPS from 42 - 18 to 50 - 9.
But that's only infantry... Look at vehicles.

Flak 17 - in game it's a verion with opening sides which means this is verion made for Luftwaffe.
Only 12-15 were ever made!
Luchs - 136 ever made (first made in IV 1942) and by III 1945 less than 200 PzIIs (not Luchs but all version of PzII) were still avaible.
Strumtiger - 18
Ostwind - 40-50
I can't find any information about Stuka zu fuss.
Puma - 500+
JP IV/70 - ~1000
King Tiger - ~500
Jadgtger - 79

Highly specialized, I get it but units like Flak, Strumtiger, Ostwind and Luchs are for me really controversial because of these numbers. They were so rare, they should be ONLY as doctrinal units. Stock units should not be rare, they should be common. These 4 units were not common at all (Ostwind is doc but non-doc for Ost).