Profile of Australian Magic

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198105012992


Thread: Hector´s way of fixing light vehicles and call ins16 Oct 2016, 20:38 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2016, 20:03 PM__deleted__ By this change you won´t kill them, they just won´t be no brainer. If enemy gets pak before you get light vehicle you will spend your manpower elsewhere and when he isnt prepared you get light vehicle. Or you get it because you think it can pay for itself or force enemy to some commader, it just won´t be no brainer as it is right now But you don't need AT Gun. I don't why but ike 90% of players always pick Pak40 as Ostheer while you can safely pick PzGrens, use them as AI and once you see V, just upgrade with double schrecks. And simply nerf their performance if anything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hector´s way of fixing light vehicles and call ins16 Oct 2016, 19:58 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2016, 19:52 PM__deleted__ Don´t get me wrong, but this thread is about fixing lights in general, not giving everyone the OP stuff. And also I thnik you will never see p3 because relic doesnt have resources to create new modes plus p3 was medium tank not light one Point is, we don't agree at the core. I don't see a problem with LV meta. The same way we could say about MV meta, becasue after 12' we see medium vehicles only. Game is divided into stages. First stage belongs to LV, second to MV and third to HV. I don't see problem with it at all. Is T70 too powerful? Yes, but we can deal with that but lowering accuracy because right now it's best at everything. Think about performance, not how to kill them in general. Making LV very expensive will just kill LV play. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hector´s way of fixing light vehicles and call ins16 Oct 2016, 19:45 PM Or we can give Ostheer Panzer 3 as a general light vehicle and let them be powerful since all factions have access to them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic wants your vote about balance16 Oct 2016, 18:44 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2016, 17:19 PMvasa1719 One at gun and t-70 done. Not really. T70 has a turret, it's very mobile, fast, self repairs, one bad positioning with AT Gun and it's gone vs T70. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic wants your vote about balance16 Oct 2016, 16:18 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2016, 13:54 PMvasa1719 Which allies unit are like stug or ele or JT ? Stug? One AT Gun and done. JT is hardly seen while 81 and T70 (+Penals+Guards) are every game. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic wants your vote about balance16 Oct 2016, 13:43 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2016, 13:08 PMViento lol.. relic is probably nazi.. all of them are against allies.. nothing mentioned about a single axis unit.. And which Axis unit is so so powerful like 81mm mortar or T70? In: Lobby
Thread: Relic wants your vote about balance15 Oct 2016, 11:33 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2016, 11:13 AMEsxile I would prefer it, taking away Icomeback button because I have a doctrine that counter everything you fielded, just have to wait for is stupid. Stug-E, Ostwind, M10 etc... Here we are facing a design vision that goes against competitive activities. But that's not a surprise when you heard lead designer saying "we want each game to tell a story" =/= competitive spirit. Like I mentioned before, I'd love to play and watch exciting games, with comebacks, with some abilities which can turn completly tide of battle, with some RNGs instead of 100% competitive game with nothing else than pure math involved. In: Lobby
Thread: Interesting Opening vs Brits on Crossing15 Oct 2016, 08:10 AM Havent seen yet but I smell toxicity in the chat from my chair already In: Replays
Thread: Relic wants your vote about balance14 Oct 2016, 16:24 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2016, 16:20 PMTobis That's why the light-vehicle meta needs to change at the same time, they allow an aggressive player to carve out a massive advantage very quickly. With reduced LV potency and increased cost, the opponent should not be so far behind in the game that skipping teching to call-ins is required to make up for the disadvantage. The problem isn't that the call-ins allow comebacks, it is that they are basically required to stay in the game. It makes the game too predictable and restricts wider strategies and commanders. There was a time when people almost did not make LV just rush for mediums and it was a bad, bad time. Wanna go back there? I don't. Relic streched LV window and that was a fresh air for this game, becasue before that LV were useless. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic wants your vote about balance14 Oct 2016, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2016, 16:06 PMTobis You say that people only use call-ins when they are on the backfoot, well in the vast majority of games, somebody will be behind in the mid-game. Look at OKW; how often do you honestly see somebody losing and go for any doctrine besides Scavenge to get an Ostwind, or Special-Whatever to get the Command Panther? How about for Ostheer? If they are losing to light vehicle rush 4/5 times they will go for mobile defense. And again with USF; lose your first stuart, buy another stuart, and get an m10. The call-in meta is incredibly predictable because of how easy and safe it is. When people only use it when they are losing, then you are still going to see it in every game because somebody will be losing. The only faction that this isn't a problem for is Brits because they have no call-in mediums or lights. Saying that nobody uses M4C Shermans is also completely wrong. Penals/cons into LendLease DSHK and follow up with no tech double shermans is a completely meta strat. And that's the thing. Someone is always on backfoot (tho call ins like Puma means that the backfoot is huge). So, I'd like see that even being on backfoot does not that that player will lose a game. Take away call ins and plenty of games will end before 15min becasue player has, let's say, 100fuel but it's not enough to build anything and on the other hand he also can't call anything. In: Lobby