Profile of Australian Magic

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198105012992


Thread: USF so worthless7 Sep 2015, 12:43 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 11:20 AMJawohl? dude if u let him get p4 or p5 u didnt dominate early game Watch some old replay of Cruzz and Fahu. Cruzz completely shuted down Fahu, pure domination and when game reached late game, Fahu (OKW) pushed him back and won. As for Usf. Non doc mortar, better scaling (coming), artillery (calliope) and generalist, not paper tank (Pershing). Plus there need to be done something about hmg and at gun. There should be in hq and unlock with any tier, or something like that. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Bofors needs a nerf against infantry7 Sep 2015, 09:29 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 09:13 AMEsxile Didn't know Brit didn't have any armored dealing AT damage. Too bad you have to chose Hammer to get it. Anvil leaves you with PIATs + ATgun which is sufficient to deal with a 2shotsdead half-track. I'm more than an Allied player but honestly Bofor is dumb, as the Panzer HQ is, but at a highest level. And Who say L2P vs Bofor deserves a L2P vs MHT. I have nothing against Bofor function, but losing an entire squad in a matter of second just because you entered in his area of fire is dumb. What you expose to counter Bofor is, today, really risky, if you are catch by the Bofor active, you lost all your infantry in 3 sec. I'm not against having the Bofor punishing infantry, but leave them a chance to retreat. You missed the point. It does not matter if its op or not. There are ways to neutrilize it. You can avoid being wiped out by bofors is many ways. So, here is a question. How to avoid MHT incendiary barrage. If its L2P as you say, you should be able to easily explain what to do, to avoid burning down with the first barrage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors needs a nerf against infantry7 Sep 2015, 09:07 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 09:01 AMEsxile And it worth telling people who say L2P vs Bofor : L2P vs mortar HT. You sound really biased. Does not matter if bofors is OP or not there are counterplays, similar to Schwerer. If you send inf in front of Schwerer, its L2P,but you can smoke it, use ground attack, mortars and in late game tanks. In theory you do same things to bofors, force it to brace and advance with flamers to burn it. That's just one way to go. Point is, I showed you theory coubterplay. Now show me L2P issue vs MHT which burns emplacement without any risk. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors needs a nerf against infantry7 Sep 2015, 09:02 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 07:27 AMKreatiir It's just sick easy to lock down a fuelpoint in the early stages of the game. In the later it's not such a problem, as it goes down easily. But it needs to be toned down. Isnt it almost the same for 8-9min Schwerer at fuel point? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors needs a nerf against infantry7 Sep 2015, 09:01 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 07:26 AMEsxile Actually I punish any type of emplacement with a Mortar HT + 40 ammo, but that reduce my experience to 1 commander (I probably need to buy some other with the unit, probably Relic conspiracy to make me buy stuff) After all if a Bofor is able to insta kill any infantry in range + light vehicles. It is fine to think any emplacement can be insta-kill by a mortar HT isn't it? same skill level is required. Thats not best comparasion. You dont have to feed bofors with infantry. No one is forcing you to send inf in front of bofors. On the other hand, there is no counter to MHT. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20157 Sep 2015, 06:15 AM 45 range Tiger is fine, but Im little worried about vet 2 range buff with base 45. In: Lobby
Thread: Churchill is a medium Tank you know6 Sep 2015, 17:56 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2015, 16:59 PMStrummingbird Churchill will never kill a Panther, but the Panther likewise will never kill a Churchill unless your opponent leaves to get himself a coffee in the interim. practically speaking it works out in favour of the generalist tank, since you win the infantry war and thus map control. It's hard to fully explain, but it's very clear in an actual game. It's obvious for me. It's just thing that someone posted, that 2 Churchills wrecked a way faster Panther. Still, vs Churchills best way is to plant mines and slowly punch it with heavy engine damage. Or stunlock with pakwall. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Churchill is a medium Tank you know6 Sep 2015, 16:53 PM Panther is way faster, has greatgreat armor and has better range, so how slow Churchill can engage Panther and kill it? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: BRITS - MOST UNBALANCED FACTION6 Sep 2015, 06:53 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 21:57 PMNuclear Arbitor that's not brit hover tanks, that's just an old (like over a year old) bug with tellers that was supposed to be fixed this past week (saw it in one of the patch notes, don't remember which). Im not sure. There was a bug that Commander upgrade could detect mines are drive over them without nothing. It might be still this bug but I cannot test it so its hard to tell. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS-25 Sep 2015, 11:29 AM Tiger is currently really underused because of Jacksons and now Firefly. I really wonder how it will work with range buff. In: COH2 Balance