Profile of braciszek

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2053

General Information
Steam: 76561198027972381


Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 18:20 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 18:17 PMausterlitz When did i say its not viable..just that it can't compete with soviet late game.This is the truth.Tell me how u micro vs t-34/85s,shermans,is-2 and isus.U might get a flank in on su-85s if he's careless. I have no problem with tiger being toned down as long as soviet armour is toned down too ..so germans can compete late game without tiger.Right now without tiger they can't.U take that away..ostheer is finished armourwise.This is not whining..just the meta. I micro by using 2 panzer IV's supported by paks. If its not an ISU, it backs off. If i have an elefant, it never comes back. If i have a Tiger along with my panzer IV's and stugs, i keep an advantage. Panzerschrecks are there to piss soviet tanks off. Soviets were never allowed to complain that their tanks were inferior to German tanks throughout the entire game. And the answer to the whining was combined arms. So everyone was so used to combined arms, that when there was a patch, Germans did not know how to counter it since they were never forced to use it themselves. In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 18:17 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 18:12 PMausterlitz Tell me how pz 4s can compete with is-2,su-85s,isu and sherman/t-34/85s.There is only 1 german tank left that could do that-tiger.Nerfing tiger does nothing if u also don't nerf t-34/85,sherman and make panther viable.On top of that is-2 will be buffed to now beat every german tank it seems.Alone nerfing tiger just kills the last ostheer tank that was able to make a fightback. Wtf is wrong with you? Tank on tanks? Ever hear of COMBINED ARMS? Pak 40's, teller mines, and panzerschrecks? Only a fool uses tanks to combat other tanks only. Panzer IV is perfect for that. Combined arms, that is. Use BOTH tier 2 and 3. In: Lobby
Thread: Remember the Flammenwurfer?13 Jun 2014, 18:14 PM The CE flamethrower is terrible, at least compared to the penals' flamethrower. Tier 1 allowing units to ride the m3 is the source of all early game complaints. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 18:09 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 18:04 PMausterlitz So what's the alternative to tiger?None. Germans have 3 tanks. pz4 can't compete after mid early late game.Not with call ins and heavies.Can't even kill inf. Panther is useless pricey. Tiger last tank standing....take that out and u might as well say ostheer needs no lategame. So the best choice is making the Tiger the best tank, much better than its same-priced counterpart? And German Tier 3 is 100% viable. German tier 4 is the one that sucks. Pz IV can compete the entire game, you must have mistaken the t34. A well microed ostwind can harrass infantry, and a stug is still fairly decent for its price and efficiency. Oh wait. I micro my tanks. In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 17:59 PM The Tiger can solo any unit. KV-2 has even less means to be made, i see, so now it is a 100% poor choice. As for volksgrenadiers, i did not catch their popcap or price. The video isnt up anymore. In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 05:33 AM Volks are an in-between to recrew team weapons and provide an AT soft counter. In: Lobby
Thread: Do you guys enjoy the vehicle-centric meta?13 Jun 2014, 05:27 AM In WW2, vehicles WERE the primary force of every army. Rambo was around 30 years later. On the eastern front, tanks led practically every assault with artillery as support. But artillery is right now junk. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies13 Jun 2014, 05:07 AM 320 mp. Its 4 panzergrenadiers with the ability to build and repair stuff. In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies12 Jun 2014, 23:22 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2014, 23:19 PMMr. Someguy I would think that scoped FG 42's would be medium-long range weapons. Have you ever tried using a scope in close quarters? It's hard as shit, all you see are big blurs. Depends on which scope you use. FG42's aren't going to have insane zoom sniper rifle scopes. They are still assault rifles, so their scopes are set for practically all the ranges infantry can have (set for medium range, but still effective at both short and long range). FG42 is good at absolutely everything. In: Lobby
Thread: Hands on Western Fronts Armies12 Jun 2014, 23:17 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2014, 23:09 PMCookiezNcreem Hope the thompson comes from the weapon locker instead of being locked to only paras Americans cant just get EVERY weapon available to them through the locker. Thomspons are doctrinal to tank crews and paratroopers. But you do get this upgrade doctrinally: Any infantry squad getting any of 3 weapons is a big ability already. In: Lobby