Profile of braciszek

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2053

General Information
Steam: 76561198027972381


Thread: Brace in Balance Preview Mod10 Sep 2015, 02:25 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 19:38 PMKeaper! At the risk of it being buried under dozens more posts about this I'd like to suggest a different mechanic entirely: Nerf brace duration (obviously) while actually allowing the emplacement structure to be decrewed at 0% health instead of destroyed entirely. Once it is decrewed it could take a bunch more shots before it is destroyed entirely, much like all other indirect fire weapons. This would allow for counter play for both UKF (defending veterancy, not wasting resources to recrew) and Axis (sniping the emplacement to stop it temporarily and removing veterancy) without the major all-or-nothing approach of dying too easily or being almost impossible to take down. Sounds cool. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 6pounder(57mm) = 75mmPak ?10 Sep 2015, 02:03 AM Ammunition. American 57mm's basic ammunition is crap but AP rounds boosts it up. UKF simply have AP rounds by default. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are the Brits actually OP?9 Sep 2015, 00:48 AM Should be nerfed further soon enough so 4v4 search rates can go back to normal. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Found an effective strategy vs UKF8 Sep 2015, 23:02 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 23:00 PMchipwreckt Thats why sappers can build mines, cheap mines, lotsa mines. Like Soviet mines, strong and great. Except RE's require tech to build; not such great of a window for mines unlike CE starter unit. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Found an effective strategy vs UKF8 Sep 2015, 22:58 PM Yup. Enough 222s defeats first AEC, kills sniper, and enough flank and kill 6 pounder. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brit-like redesign for outdated commanders8 Sep 2015, 21:17 PM Sure, for most of these. If the 250 halftrack could be upgraded to the 250/7 in some way, thatd be awesome... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20158 Sep 2015, 20:58 PM I would have rather a 240 health increase to tiger through vet instead of more range increase, because people complained its too soft - instead of giving it the ability to counter its counters... In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20158 Sep 2015, 20:56 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 19:33 PMFiresparks well, it was really an oversized cromwell. Similar to how the E8 is an oversized sherman and the t34 85 is an oversized t34 76. Except in this game the others dont cost so much more than the weaker variant. No point glorifying the Comet in Hammer, then, if its just a fat cromwell... I havent been using Anvil often enough, might as well get used to using super Churchill meatshields + fast firing great AI cromwell instead of a has been late war tank that actually had threatening stats, but its British and doesnt have a balkenkreuz painted all over it, so it actually cant be distinguishable. Continue the Comet nerfs... In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20158 Sep 2015, 19:29 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 19:23 PMFiresparks If the comet was getting nerfed, I rather it being a nerf to its attack range. 50 range is really too much for a tank that can attack infantry. Plus the stug only get 50 range as well. Thats kind of one if the big things differentiating it from being an oversized cromwell, though. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20158 Sep 2015, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 19:03 PMCabreza Should the IS2 get 45 range so it is harder to kite with a JP4, Stug, or Panther? Heavy tanks should get 70 range to counter Elefant/ISU better. In: Lobby