Profile of Gluhoman

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 380

General Information
Steam: 76561197975662848


Thread: Sovs vs leigs.20 Feb 2017, 06:53 AM Iam kinda tired of double leig abuse. Especially on small maps like faymonville approach, where leigs can shell your base just from the middle of the map. Of course there is katy but it comes too late, when leigs hit vet 4 with a huge range. Leigs bleed and wipe your squads during the match very heavily. It is very hard to flank leigs with your infantry because they are always standing near the AA HQ or med HQ. Every game i have to go in guard mortar to counter leigs. Usf and brits have calliop and land mattress which are helping them to counter this tactic. To my mind it is better to reduce the range of leigs (after nerfing calliop and land mattress of course). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WBP Merged changelog (v1.0 to newest)17 Feb 2017, 09:58 AM Guards were nerfed too strong. Big damage nerf and cost increase. After wbp they will be trash. I agree that nowadays they are a bit too good but this nerf is too strong. Better nerf cost or nerf damage, not both. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What thing that they patched out do you miss the most?3 Feb 2017, 20:43 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2017, 21:40 PMDonnieChan I have deja vu. Every time i see you, you always write bad about brits. Take it cool son. In: Lobby
Thread: osttruppen31 Jan 2017, 21:32 PM Ostruppen are fine. Use them with combination of pz grenadiers. Giving them any other stuff will be too op with their bonus. Maybe sandbags would be great but I don't know. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Adolf Hitler Mistakes 20 Jan 2017, 11:01 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jan 2017, 14:50 PMCrumbum There are countless mistakes like not getting Ukraine(who hated and were ready to fight the Soviets) on side, due to Nazi ideology which classed them as slavs meaning they were not fit as allies. Also Hitler making numerous strategic errors and not letting his generals take complete control of fighting during the war was a huge blunder. Stalin recognised just before the battle of Moscow that he was not fit to make military decisions (massive losses of early operation Barbarossa) and that he should let his generals take charge, Hitler should have done the same. After all Hitler had only reached the rank of Corporal in WW1 but in WW2 he acted like he was an experienced field marshal. In 1941 and 1942 soviet forces were commanded by old school generals like Voroshilov, Timoshenko and Budeny. They made a huge amount of military mistakes therefor huge losses. They couldnt understand the main principles of new war. In 1943 and so on, stalin change them with Shukov, Vasilevsky and others. Stalin always let to do generals thier job. But they fought in civil war and didnt want to learn new principles of war. Stalin understood it. In: The Library
Thread: The Land Matress is to strong19 Jan 2017, 07:47 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 20:58 PMullumulu What a joke...it counters all...it make good dmg even vs tanks...it wipes all, without a little chance to retreat...it is so easy with it...stuka can easily dodge...but this think is so strong...it need a nerf into the power from kathuscha Lol, if you lose your tanks to matters, i think its your problem. It is very strong against hqs and team weapons. Everyting else is fine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Land Matress is to strong18 Jan 2017, 20:54 PM Matters was nerfed. So it is balanced. Its not so accurate, but it fires a lot of rockets. People use matters a lot, because it is the only good mobile ukf unit. So it can counter leig spams, which mortar pit cant. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Churchill could do with a buff.16 Jan 2017, 15:20 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jan 2017, 11:06 AMAlphrum Yes it will, if comet wernt so good, we will be seeing some nice Armour combos such as firefly in combination with Churchill This is possible only in big games. Church plus firefly combo is a huge fuel loss. So people will spam cromwells and at guns without any combined arms, because after a huge nerf for comet, these upgrades will become useleth. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Churchill could do with a buff.16 Jan 2017, 11:03 AM Nerfing comet will not help church get better In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.5 Update15 Jan 2017, 18:08 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2017, 23:24 PMFrost Completly wrong. Almost in every paragraph. After 30 games on ladder with only using cons + molos I discovered The New Way with molos. But let's start 125 MP and 15 fuel isn't that high. Especially for this kind of weapon. It's worth to tech 9 by 10 times. I'll explain you why. Range is really cool when your cons hit 2nd vet + bulletin. Just look at it. http://i.imgur.com/8Pw7MBH.jpg I'd never say it's shitty range but you propably didn't know that one because you don't even ever bought this upgrade. What about throwing time? Well, for 15 munition I'd prefer molos over overpriced volks nade which sinks your ammunition situation sooo fast. Still it's decent when you stay behind sandbags builded by cons because if you throw molos ahead - opponent won't use against you. Especially good versus close combat infantry like sturm pios etc. Rest of your thoughts is only a theory - in most cases you won't change your sqauds direction in time and get some damage from flames + you are forced to move when my cons are still standing and firing. It's not about wiping garrisoned units but flush 'em out. Imagine if only volks had 15 muni molos instead of their granades - OKW wouldn't be so ducked against maps with strong, stone houses at cut offs. Well it's not nade for every case you have in this game but still - even incendiary granade is pretty easy to dodge beacuse even when it hits you - still doesn't make huge damage. But 30 ammunition which could be invested in one more mine is gone. To sum up - this is little different type of nade with small issues but it's still useful and U would change OKW incendiary granade for molos every time I play this game. Cool, lets take bulletins to make shitty grenade slightly useful. All in all, it is better to tech up faster then making this upgrade and you didnt explain why it is better to make it (in economical aspect). Your explanations and thoughts are theory too. Because, the world is not consist of cons sandbags, if you pay enough attantion, you will get zero damage from molotov, maybe you will get some, but it doesnt critical if you run on cons from mid range and therefor they make less damage to your squad. About okw, they dont bleed ammo so hard like wermacht, so they can spam them (In my case enemy okw always have ammo to throw a grenade, same thing when iam playing for okw). Molotov on okw is meh, because they havent got Ura and they they will get suppresed by maxims, 50 cal and other stuff. And the main thing, okw grenade can kill your squad, but molotov has a really poor chanse to wipe enemy. And son, i know how works molotov and i understand that after nerf become shit. So, dont blame people in such things without enough knowledge. In: COH2 Gameplay