Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: OKW and USF doesn't get alot of love in the last patch27 Jun 2021, 14:31 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2021, 14:28 PMOlfin Actually, you didn't get the reason of the post, I am not complaining about balance, I think they are doing great in this regard, but many factions got new units and their was a good opportunities to add new units for OKW without breaking the balance. And OKW does not lack anything after previous commander patch that introduced new units and abilities to them. They got least, because they were strongest and lacked least. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW and USF doesn't get alot of love in the last patch27 Jun 2021, 13:52 PM Not really sure what you expected here. OKW commander selection already got love and new things and OKW itself has highest winrates in most game modes, you'd have to live under a rock to not see OKW not getting as much as others if anything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A question about Mainline Infantry Vet25 Jun 2021, 21:44 PM 1) Should be in gameplay 2) Cons-because they need it to compete against other mainlines as they had no upgrade for years and the one they finally got arrives at the latest. PFs have no larger values, just more offensive allocation of them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: why are penals better than cons objectively25 Jun 2021, 11:56 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2021, 11:53 AMVipper PLS read more carefully this part of my post because you are disagreeing and proceed to repeat what I have post only to actually agree with what I have posted. "At some point the designed was changed and Penal become "stock elite" similar to PG." It couldn't be any more irrelevant what has happened in pre-alpha. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: why are penals better than cons objectively25 Jun 2021, 11:53 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2021, 11:29 AMOsinyagov Well, he is not far away. I’ve seen concepts for Red Army from 2011-2012, and they mentioned visual differences for building depends on speciality (something like Hammer and Anvil for UKF). So, in the very beginning, idea like that were discussed, but not implemented to the game. Edit: found it If it died at conceptual board, then it wasn't design that made it into actual game. Nothing more, nothing less then that. He is once again making up things and twisting how things were. The absolutely closest thing that made it was penals being replaced by guards/shocks in T1, but I'm not sure if it was still in early post release or was scrapped in beta, which still is not what he tried to describe. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: why are penals better than cons objectively25 Jun 2021, 11:26 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2021, 08:11 AMAvnas outside of how the game actually is, does anyone want to explain the logic behind, the mainstay conscript of russia is generally a worse unit than criminals forced to fight fresh out of jail? There were penal battalions and penal companies. Penal companies were what in-game battalion description says. Penal battalions were trained OFFICERS and had supply priority over regular infantry. Its historically accurate they are better performing and equipped then fresh conscripts. Its also historically accurate that Relic doesn't do their research well. In game however, conscripts are much better, especially in cost efficiency, lasting power and late game scaling - they also have much more flexibility and utility even if most of it is locked behind doctrines. Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2021, 09:14 AMVipper Relic original design had 3 types of armies/commanders: Shock armies that provided shock troops Guard armies that provided Guards troops NKVD armies that provides Penal battalion At some point the designed was changed and Penal become "stock elite" similar to PG. Then thing started to become complicated... That's completely untrue and deliberately misleading. In fact, for AI performance and cost, Penals were CARBON COPY of PGs and were on exact same level of elite infantry as them with sole exception of not having grenades and AT upgrade compared to PGs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Pathfinders need to be balanced25 Jun 2021, 11:21 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2021, 21:31 PMGrim They should make them a 290mp, 4 man squad with no snare. Ideally in a commander that is going to have access to paratroopers later on so that they gimp their MP supply for when they unlock them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bunkers/Flak/Bofors/Mortar Pits/FP should be recrewable24 Jun 2021, 12:56 PM Fun fact: They were, but certain Mannstein worship lovers were complaining that it makes half of that uncounterable. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Penal versatility24 Jun 2021, 07:32 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2021, 04:36 AMOperator09 fucking soviet all build PTRS. What a balance "Opponent was finally given proper AT squad and they use it now, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PTRS Penals and Soviet vs Ostheer balance22 Jun 2021, 21:35 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2021, 12:15 PMVipper Damage is damage regardless if you call it Alpha beta or gamma. Even sander93 point out that the DPS of PTRS Panls vs mediums are comparable with other AT infatry. Do you have another attack of severe selective memory? Forgot already how last one ended for you? Because Sander said that in context of stationary penals vs tanks and they LOST all the tests in question. And if you really, honestly, genuinely believe that "damage is damage" and alpha strike is irrelevant, please tell me, why all the alpha damage units in the game, from sniper to sturmtiger/JT were nerfed to deal much less damage, shoot more slowly, NOT have that alpha hit at all and had it replaced for "reliability"(B4 anyone?) or were made dependent on other units? Alpha damage might not matter at whatever scrub rank in 4v4 RT meatgrinder you play, but it most definitely does matter a whole lot in 1s and 2s, especially when all players involved know how to play just as good as google for stats. In: COH2 Balance