General Information
Register Time: 14 Nov 2013, 01:47 AM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/gdotdot
Steam: 76561197972083544
Residence: United States
Nationality: United States
Game Name: G.dot
Only good BFs was 1942 and BC2, i hugely doubt they will make something as good, especially after looking at this marketing nonsense. Black soldiers in mainland european conflict (where is asians, namely, chinese, which, from what i know, were actually a thing, btw?) and woman warriors coming from country where woman forbiden to even expose face in public.
Im not sure what your point is here,both sides actually have stupid the most stupid offmaps, skillplanes, and mark target combos.
I'm referring to Mark Target before it was nerfed - when coupled with those abilities it was ridiculously OP.
Im also not sure why you're only naming allied abilities....Does axis not have like, the most AA in the game
I'm naming the allied ones because they are more prevalent than the axis ones. The axis commanders that have good off map planes are part of commanders no one used for 4v4. You rarely saw Ju-87 commanders being used in 4v4 for axis teams.
im not gonna go look it up again but every single team except the ones i mentioned played a noticeable amount more allies 4v4 at than axis.
northweapons team.. pls. i started the 4v4 only usf vs the world meme, js, and it hinged completely on the calliope because otherwise it was not 'ez' even vs complete morons.
Yes that was a bit of an exaggeration.
Im still deeply confused as to why you're just pointing out mark target like its some end all be all, considering, again, axis has a more cost effective and more powerful version of it on the cpanther.
Again, im referring to pre-nerf, sorry for not clarifying.
This is also a totally different argument but 4v4 AT is pretty much vs randoms 98% of the time and it is not difficult at all for any team or strategy to dominate with, axis or allied.
which is pretty much what you're basing a huge amount of your argument around, i'd imagine. Theres been like 2 4v4 tournaments ever. Neither of which, based of the opinions of most of the 1v1,2v2 elitists that dared played in them, were taken THAT seriously. I'd imagine things would be different if we convince Jesulin or DevM to take 4v4 100% dead seriously for a while
and b4 one shotting? what is this, 1995? How long ago was precision strike and the damage veterancy removed?
Either way I'd imagine people learned pretty quickly to have one of out of 4 players pick a recon/divebomb doctrine for the b4, especially since those docs usually include the lulzy beat my dick while playing with one hand Elefant
Yes 2 tournaments, one which had a ton of data for team games ( https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ5dSgScQ7YVEjBhzhSpl2A/videos - load more videos till you reach the LOH games ), many games were played under league of heroes and the 4v4AT invitiational had a small sample of very good 4v4 teams. If jesulin and devm spent time doing 'x' is a poor argument. Pretty sure there we're tons of people saying RtN would dominate 4v4 during LOH(luvnest, OMGPOP,Ciez,Momo, dusty etc) and they got destroyed by 4v4AT teams. Obviously they are great 1v1 players but being good at 1v1 has never translated into being good at team games. You know were lucky its not 1995, because if it was we'd be on AOL and wearing JNCO's, be grateful .
i know i love not running into you or bray or other top tiers.
Such nostalgia Remember all the good teams we had? GOHARD, Gulls, TATUS, SOE, Cohbros, MoD (now basically a 1v1/2v2 clan), TAB, StC, FOCUS, cB, Schnugglers Crew, I'm sure I am missing others.
Now I look at the leader board and see aladin and 3 other randos holding every rank by going 11-0... Ugh...