it aint no grammar... it be weapon categorisation, is all. now weapon categorisation might be the wrong term, but then english isnt my native language
On topic: dont use that call in. it sucks. you wont have to bother about its faulty description then
There is no letter s in categorization, the real time spell checker should alert you to that. |
Entity extensions that have expensive updates now run in parallel on multiple processor cores.
Optimized weapon targeting update.
Optimized PropertyBagGroup lookups by pre-caching them to allow for constant time lookup.
Replaced temporary data structures using heap allocators with stack allocators.
Optimized AI combat evaluations and AI Info updates for AI Opponent and made them run in parallel
Can anyone break these down a little. I don't know if this is more cynthia trolling or if it's something real I just don't recognize. |
|
Cusack, that's not what he's saying. |
|
How do you think this will play into the party system that coh2 multi is built around? I is it going to roll a random army for the side your teamate picked? Is it only applicable in 1v1? Only applicable when your the only one in a party? This isn't something easy to put in. How about you assign an army to 4 numbers, find an rng online, set the range to be those 4 numbers, then roll it before you choose your army? Don't get me wrong, I'm not against the feature, I just don't see how it can be implemented in game. |
|
I like how Ciez came in here arguing stats and only providing 1 number set to back up claims. That's cherry picking too. Ciez, the Jackson doesn't have a speed advantage over the panther. I don't know if you bothered to actually look or not, but these two have almost he exact same movement characteristics. The panther has a higher top speed by .1 and the m36 has higher acceleration by .1. The panther can stop a bit faster too, for those oh shit moments ( difference of .2). |
Uh no...i simply wrote that i'd rather have M10's than jacksons nondoctrinally.....which is assuming they'd be used together with shermans as stated by my "Get 2-3 shermans first" comment..
And when i was talking about critical mass i was referring to the fact that 3-4 shermans can simply do more than 3-4 jacksons. Since the jacksons are only decent at one job...unlike shermans which are decent/good at many jobs....since it is a workhorse medium tank after all....
...are you trolling or what?
Jaigen trolling? No  |
|
I like to give them 1 bar, just in case an lmg drops. At vet3 they are extremely strong with an lmg. |
|
The ONLY benefit of RE squad, is 1 pop. Maybe volley fire if you can micro it well. The real reason though, is for that 1 pop. You can use them to fight, but they just aren't as good as other higher pop options. |
|
There should be a bigger steam sale coming up soon, patience people. Patience shouldn't be hard, actually. |
|
One time my opponent joked with me ( I think he was joking) that I was shooting tennis balls at him.
I actually have some good use of m36 in close range. It usually comes down to something like, am I willing to lose this jackson so he loses that more expensive thing?
Still, it's situational. It's map dependent. You need the RNG on your side. Your timing must be right. |
United States
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
