So you'd rather the top players knock each other out in early round Best-of-1's instead of in the late rounds?
The chances of that would be: The bracket in question/Number of brackets in a round, aka if the tournament has 100 players, then the chance of that happening, in the first round, is: 1/50 = 2 percent. It is 4 percent for the second round and so forth. Sooner or later, the "best" players will meet. But, it is random, and should it happen then I am fine with it.
Not that I am against seeding, Ami. But the scenario you describe has a low chance of happening. I presume the monthly cups will have seeding to avoid such scenarios though.
You'd rather see top players crush new players in the late round Best-of-3s?
Assuming it happens, then yes. The system is random and thus fair to them. It is a tournament and they should expect to lose if they are new at the game, at some point. The seeding would not change that; a new player could still make it up there and get crushed.
I can't stress enough how important seeding is for single-elimination events. I guess if you think "random seeding is ok," then we will see the results of this approach first hand.
You are talking about the worst cause scenarios, they may happen, or they may not. The results should be random as x approaches infinity. Where x is the number of tournaments. Sorry to get all Mathematical about it. And by "random" I mean that the best players will rise to the top, most of the time.
There's even more to it than that. It's about fairness. Say the randomizer puts DevM in the top half of the bracket, and puts Aimstrong, Jove, Luvnest, Jesulin, PauL & HelpingHans in the bottom half of the bracket. The latter bunch tire each other out struggling through insanely difficult early rounds, while DevM cruises through his entire bracket without even breaking a sweat. Then DevM meets say an extremely tired and exhausted Luvnest in the finals and utterly destroys him. Do you wanna see that? I don't.
Hold on, let me calculate the chance of that, using the previous 100 players.
I am not sure if my math is rock solid here, but since the system is random:
- There are 100 spots.
- A player is equally likely to be selected to any of them due to the random selection.
- The chance of any particular spot to be chosen is 1 percent, 1/100.
- The chance for every spot after that choice is 1/(100-n), where n is the number of spots taken.
- Thus, for Ami's scenario, the chance is: 1/100 × 1/99 × 1/98 × 1/97 × 1/96 × 1/95 × 1/94 = 0.0000000000000124
Also known as a 0.00000000000124 percent chance. In common speak: Ridiculously small. But as I said: My math may not be rock solid here. Statistics is not my field.
Anyway, sorry again, Ami. If that were to happen then the players can be given a break of half an hour to an hour, so that they may rest and recover. You know, get some food and water, lay down on the couch for a little while, gather their thoughts, and/or formulate a plan or strategy.