Profile of elchino7

Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2015, 19:15 PMJadame!

What is shock troops. Osttruppen were semi-useful at best, although i used them as hard counter to soviet sniper builds to climb into top 50 of 1v1 ladder.

Really broken thing was 240mp assgrens.

Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 16:20 PMKatitof

Given the removal of visible level and stars because it would scare scrubs to death and make them quit at the start was the reason why any indicators of players skill or time played were removed in the first place?

I don't think the idea got much of a chance.

Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2015, 11:42 AMJohnnyB

"You as comunity" ruined OKW and now you think it's "bad designed" while in alpha, beta, and at the beginning of WFA were simply loving the faction, nothing about "bad design" said then. It became "bad designed" only after fanboys tears destroyed it. The soviet nerfs you mentioned were blatantly needed since longtime ago, long before they were asked. And they only ocured because the same fanboys, bored to death to play only one faction, tried a little axis factions too, and they didn't win anymore. And they like to win. The "against OKW" offensive stopped because the faction is simply wrecked (LOL "balanced" LOL) but now, what do you know, Ostheer starts to be what it's supposed to be. The mg42 change (needed for such a long time) just came and we already have 1-2 threads in which nerfing is required in order to make it shit as it was before. The stug was recenlty changed back into what it supposed to be, a TD, and now we have a TWP thread.


I remember people complaining in alpha/beta of OKW design cause it only purpose was to go for the cutoff and deny resources instead of trying to obtain them for yourselves. Also the faction didn't work on most maps on which you couldn't connect your resources.
Unit tech location on certain units was also a mess.
1 week prior to release they made a complete revamp.

Problem with OKW: it remains hard to use on 1v1, sees it's potential on 2v2 and broken on bigger modes. OKW had too many broken things, or can you defend Obers with retreat bonus modifiers or Kubeljesus first itineration.

MG42 performance is fine. Problem with cover or cost adjustment is needed if you compare it to the performance of others MGs.

TWP: if you were not "abusing" it before, that's your problem. It's not the same a static platform rather than a mobile one. It's not the same 110 x 2, than 170 x 2 penetration. It's not the same been able to survive 3 shots or 4.



What I believe is that are quite a few who want balance but fanboys are many, much more than you want to imply. Top players want balance and they are applauded when they speak for allied and treated with "Oh, I didn't expect this from you, you are a top player, how can you say such a stupid thing?" when they are speaking in axis' favor.

People jump on the comments whenever they suit their agenda. Nothing more, nothing less.

I am playing enough soviets and USF to know what a rifle spam with smoke grenades / early AA can do, what 120 spam, katiushas or 85s can do. And I like playing Allied factions too, I don't believe to be easier to play as some are saying. But the quantity of allied bias in forums is simply disgusting. That is what I said.


120mm is bad after the nerf. German mortar has better profile and has double RoF
85s are they have always been but now you have better tools to deal with them. I'll take several 85s rather than double Tiger/IS2/ISU anyday.
Theres a difference between easier to play and been better. OKW pre nerf was ez mode on +2v2 on the same way USF 1v1 against OH.
1v1 and 2v2 factions are similar to play at all degrees of skill with little variations according to meta/balance. The problem since day 0 will remain on 3v3-4v4 modes. So they are right to say it's easier to play them as micro tax, resources, map, presence and reinforce, mistake punishement, quality and number of players play on their favour.