Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: jackson armor nerf23 Jan 2020, 22:46 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2020, 22:18 PMEsxile in a raw probably, but where is the churchill equivalent for USF? Or the tulip. Again I don't see how having 2 fire mode is going to make it worst vs Pz4s unless making modes worst for the sake of it. But what in USF arsenal is going to counter Pz4s in that case? Only Atgun? People here tend to forget that Jackson is also counter for Pz4s. The Jackson itself, AT gun, Zook and basically 1v1 trading against non skirt PIV with Sherman (you will lose on equal conditions). I'll rather see nerf in other direction (armor and acceleration, keeping top speed) than 2 vet 0 munition types. I would rather see the accuracy of the weapon lowered down and instead semi heavies and heavies get their size increased to keep values equal against them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf23 Jan 2020, 21:56 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2020, 20:35 PMEsxile You're making the Jackson being hard counter to both categories at cost of not being good vs both of them at the same time. Today the Jackson is not good vs mediums, it is just the best option because Sherman AT sucks. I mean Stug or jpz4 are good vs mediums at cost of being casemate but stug is cheap and jpz4 has insane stats for its price. Your solution isn't really going to solve the issue. As Ostheer you not going to have at the same time Pz4 and Pz5 (unless big game mode) so jackson will still be hard countering everything you deploy by selecting one or the other mode. As OKW, Pz4 and Pz5 will be countered by the low accuracy/High pen mode and PUMA/Jpz4 by the other one. Don't get me wrong, as USF fanboy I'd love your idea to be implemented. But as a player seeking balance, not really Imo, its better the make sherman AT being superior to what it is today and Jackson being only low acc/high pen etc.. mode Today the Jackson IS GREAT vs mediums because it still retains the mobility, accuracy, Shots to kill (200 dmg low RoF still required 4 shots to kill a medium tank) while having the extra 160 HP to survive and the improved RoF on vanilla shots. The Jackson would be better if it was a Firefly clone basically. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf23 Jan 2020, 19:34 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2020, 15:30 PMEsxile You'll just make the Jackson even more OP with this solution. Or to make both modes bad vs their respective targets. Low accuracy + High pen + Low rof + High damage = Good against heavy armor High accuracy + Avg Pen + Avg Rof + Normal damage = Good against mediums There are other possibles combinations but that's just an example. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank balance overhaul23 Jan 2020, 19:28 PM People didn't like "death crit" saves. If a vehicle goes to 0 it should die/abandoned. Before you could get: Shoot > Engine damage > shoot > main gun destroyed > shoot > engine destroyed > shoot > death. Then account for misses and failures in penetration. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf22 Jan 2020, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 19:57 PMSkysTheLimit Isnt the pen bonus for Jackson at vet 3? Guide on this site says so, but could be out of date U are right. The Su85 is the one which gets it at vet2 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf22 Jan 2020, 19:55 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 17:45 PMblvckdream IMO what I'd to with the Jackson is a) make it 560 HP like the Stug b) remove the penetration bonus it gets with vet and replace it with +80HP c) make it slightly cheaper What this does--> it makes the Jackson less durable and less capable of just mindlessly rushing around the map. It also makes HVAP useful because now you will not penetrate every allied vehicle with the stock round. Then after those changes it can be made slightly cheaper to compensate for the performance nerfs. IB4 someone mentions the BIG TDs and how that affects teamgames. What i would like: Penetration on ~~vet 2~~ vet3 reduced to keep same chance of pen as what Axis tank get at vet 2. Probably hit mobility. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank balance overhaul22 Jan 2020, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 18:35 PMSkysTheLimit Yeah I meant still in the game, my bad Don't think I've ever seen driver injured though Originally, Stuka AT strafe used to do lots of different crits. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fallschirmjager units are too broken imo22 Jan 2020, 19:48 PM Falls have snares because originally OKW was not meant to have non doctrinal snares. With a reduced pool of commanders, you could either opt for PF or Falls as a solution. Several years later and reworks in between, they went from "i'm spawning right in your face so i can kill your sniper" to this ambush kind of unit. If they still have a snare is because it was hard how strong or weak a unit will be after a rework. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank balance overhaul22 Jan 2020, 10:01 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2020, 03:11 AMSkysTheLimit A lot of these are already in game though? Or are you saying not to add new sources of them? I briefly skimmed through what it was written in the first post. I'm basically saying that for TDs, soft criticals and ones which are not permanent till repairs are fine. I'm also implying that this will never see the light on CoH2 and is just a consideration to have for the future at most. PD: all what i mentioned is already in the game in some sort of form or was removed from it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf22 Jan 2020, 00:03 AM Not sure where are you guys getting the numbers but Puma/Jackson RoF should be on coh2db stats. Puma is (3.6 : 4.1 Reload) + 0.13 * 2 (ready and aim) For an avg of: 4.11s Jackson: (4.375 : 4.975) + 0.13 * 2 + 0.5 + 1.125 (Wind) Avg: 6.56 AP Jackson: 5.2 - 5.8 + 0.13 * 2 + 0.44 + 1.1 Avg: 7.3 Reminder that in combat you have to discount the first salvo, as the vehicle already has the shell loaded. Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2020, 22:48 PMDoomlord52 It's possible, but I can't think of a time when an old change (2+ years) has been reverted because the core reasoning for the change was flawed. And as others have said, it would make Axis heavies (or panthers) extremely oppressive against USF. Not sure if i got the point, but you mean a change which has already been established changed years later? Because if not, there's plenty of changes which were completely flopped upside down. Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2020, 22:29 PMSkysTheLimit Can we stop ignoring the Puma's vet 1 ability? We are literally talking about the puma vs a turreted vehicle, and it has a turret lock ability. That can completely swing a fight against a Jackson and you left it out completely from this analysis HVAP can certainly change puma to a 2-shot kill, but the reset on the aim/cooldown could fuck it up since the Puma has smoke to break contact and a sight range advantage Accuracy is the only point that I think is trouble. Could increase the target size of Jackson since most people already think it needs some nerfs against everything anyway. The armor nerf should happen regardless just to at least eliminate the rare p4 deflections A Puma on equal terms fighting a Jackson retreating will never be able to kill it. Even if you take into account the vet 1 critical shot. It's a turret lock, not a main gun disabled. I made the test running a Jackson across the Test range while a Puma chases and uses Aimed shot. Without human input and having to cross more than half the map, there were cases on which the Puma was able to kill a Jackson but only when this factors occured: -Puma lands first shots due to vision. -Puma immediately hits aimed shot to lock turret. -Puma moves out of line of the Jackson while keeping chase. -Puma has great luck and connect shots and not one deflects. -Jackson misses at least 1/2 shots. If the Jackson has human input the Puma can't realistically defeat it. In: COH2 Balance