Profile of OZtheWiZARD

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1439

General Information


Thread: Stuart and Quad rush are pretty retarded,but....10 Aug 2015, 16:16 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 15:55 PMAlexzandvar When dealing with light vehicles AT rifles are better than shreks, mostly because of the fact AT rifles literally cannot miss vehicles. Here's a tip for you. They won't miss when you come closer. But guess what I trade. I'll be for the upgrade you propose if Allies get Shreck equivalent and Axis loose it. Basically swap the weapons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stuart and Quad rush are pretty retarded,but....10 Aug 2015, 15:32 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 15:20 PMAlexzandvar Like jesus, I'm trying to suggest ways we can allow Allies to keep the light vehicle fun times without it being to punishing for Axis, why does this make people so upset? EDIT: And for the record, USF doctrines have multiple LefH counters and the Soviet howitzer can beat it by just straight up shooting at it. There is no fucking need for that. Why don't you get it? Except for M5 quad there is nothing wrong with light vehicle play. They will nerf it next patch, no doubt, and everything will return to normal. Shreck is already better then PTRS? Why would you introduce an inferior upgrade to the faction that doesn;t need it? Do you like the look of it or what? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stuart and Quad rush are pretty retarded,but....10 Aug 2015, 15:20 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 15:00 PMAlexzandvar I have no idea how to use 222 ~~cannot~~ to counter anything other than a M20 or M3, it's extremely fragile. And the problem is that Pak's aren't supposed to counter light vehicles. They aren't mobile so unless one accidentally drives deep into the arc of the gun (but not to deep were it can just circle around) it ain't going to die. Relying on 222's won't work for countering light vehicles. ^There you go I fixed it for you. Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 15:00 PMAlexzandvar Except none of those things were made for countering light vehicles. The 222 can't do it because it's to fragile and dies extremely easily to concentrated small arms fire, the Shrek is easy to kite with, and yes it meant for supporting your other things but in a close 1v1 or 2v2 game you won't have enough a lot of shreks out in the opening minutes of a match. Shreks are only good for fighting light vehicles if your enemy is really bad at micro or just get's unlucky and drives around a corner. Wait, what? Shreck no good against light vehicles? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 issues3 Aug 2015, 15:51 PM The only unbalanced unit in Soviet T3 is M5 quad. Neither SU-76 nor T-70 fit to that category. I guess soon we will have "Over powered" topic for each one of Soviet units... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flacktrack30 Jul 2015, 15:10 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2015, 22:03 PMZyllen great arguments there mate. if you have nothing useful to say then dont post this shit. How about you read the whole topic and my previous replies before posting comment like this mate? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flacktrack29 Jul 2015, 22:01 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2015, 15:10 PMAlexzandvar How about actually trying to articulate your point instead of just passive aggressively shitposting? What passive aggressive? Just read whatever everyone else is writing in this topic. Flacktruck is fine and your argument is flawed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flacktrack29 Jul 2015, 14:53 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2015, 12:06 PMAlexzandvar USF players go Stuart almost every game now and Soviet players will almost always get early M5's. Which is the problem; the Flaktrack can't be used because people can get a counter out to it (that it can't avoid or fight back at) at the same time it hits the field. I don't really want to repeat myself. Just read other people replies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M5 Quadrush29 Jul 2015, 10:23 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2015, 22:59 PMAlexzandvar -Needs a flat damage reduction -Needs to cost more -Needs small arms always causing main gun destroyed fixed as it allows the M5 to kill even Puma's if it catches one with half health. No. Needs either a cost increase/ adjustment or damage reduction. Not all of that at once. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flacktrack29 Jul 2015, 10:08 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2015, 22:25 PMAlexzandvar So it isn't broken Flaktraks hit the field exactly the same time as Stuarts and M5RapeMounts do? How about different response to different battlefield situations? Going flacktruck against Stuart is stupid. It's OK for OKW to not build Flacktruck every game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flacktrack28 Jul 2015, 22:23 PM How about we don't change what isn't broken? In: COH2 Balance