Profile of d0ggY

Jump back to quoted post2 Nov 2018, 23:12 PMLoopDloop

But but but then I have to actually pay attention. You mean to tell me that I have to actualy micro if I don't want to stupidly lose units? Completely unacceptable. /s

Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2018, 23:42 PMSully

It should definitely be brought up to par in the anti aircraft department. Units such as the Centaur, OKW Flak HT, and Sov Quad HT really outshine it.

I'm not sure it needs a damage buff, but it could certainly be cheaper for what you get.

Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2018, 14:32 PMLuciano

hard bg

Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2018, 10:12 AMCresc

Or rather why do they force it in the map pools?
Have you had any fun playing in these maps? A quick look at it and from player's feedback none of the 2v2 maps (let it be semoskiy, karkov, minsk, westwall...) are balanced or fun to play in.

Why did they even bother leaving semoskiy winter in the pool? NOBODY LIKES THIS MAP RELIC IT HAS BEEN YEARS PEOPLE COMPLAIN ABOUT SEMOSKIY!

What's so hard to understand here? Stop shoving 2v2 map in our as*** I think it's fair to say nobody has fun playing them.


I'm sick of playing minsk or karkov, all the vetos I have are used in these shitty maps and I have none left to veto these two.

All the imbalance in maps come from maps like crossing in the woods, where everybody tells you about axis dominance over USF for instance.

I'm surprised nobody ever speaks of 2v2 maps being in 1v1, not like there is anything wrong, but why are they in the ranked pool to begin with? I wonder why for real, after the incessant whining from players being mad at trash like semoskiy...

On top of that, the starting point is not fixed, so if for instance you are in the 1P starting point in north karkov, you actually lose 3 SECONDS to rush your first infantry at the cut-off.