No insult there.
Your tier argument was irrelevant, because overall, Ost still has less, regardless of tier selection.
Why is this a bad thing? I'm saying the options germans have are fare more superior to the Sovjet ones.
Your "rarely seen" argument was irrelevant, because its subjective.
Yes and finding the disparity a problem is also subjective. Atgun barrage is expensive and su76 is not a great tank overall
Your German Panzerwerfer/Mortar/Howitzer "indirect" fire rate of fire and cooldowns argument was irrelevant, because it is accounted for commensurately by Sov alternatives having asymmetric equivalence in terms of more damage and AoE.
-Panzerwerfer has lower cooldown and fires all it's missiles in one go > more damage and higher AoE
-German howitzer is VASTLY superior to Sovjet one. Sovjet fires only 8/9 shells while the german fires a lot more and has only ~30 sec cooldown. That is a lot more damage total
-German mortar might be balanced against soviet one but feels stronger, let's say they are balanced
That gives 2 extra nondoc units for Soviets
ATgun barrage, expensive but okay damage
SU76, weak tank with okay damage
Your argument of RNade as an indirect fire option is irrelevant because a Molotov can also be thrown indirectly, and furthermore is asymmetrically balanced due to no minimum range and superiority vs buildings as well as potential to crit the armor reliant Ost troops.
You were listing all the indirect fire options even though you would never see all of those in a normal game. Might as well include more