Profile of Fluffi

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 211

General Information


Thread: Homogenization12 Oct 2015, 21:40 PM OP, I absoultely agree. But people work like this: They look at sth and compare. In everyday life, people compare themselves to their surroundings. In game terms, they compare units of faction a and faction b. Even if the units were designed to be different, people search these diffences, and bias leads to false assumptions then. This is why they will say stuff like ,,why is unit a's armor lower than unit b's armor, that makes no sense and should be changed.'' The human mind can't be changed. And the devs actually listening too much to the mob is a danger to gamedesign. Yup, there, I said it In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Multiple small issues (Audio, Texture, Gameplay & Animation)9 Oct 2015, 12:00 PM Polish matters. Details matter. Don't let this be dismissed by any naysayers. Such little things make a much bigger difference in feel, immersion and thus in enjoyment than many actually realize consciously. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: OKW Incendiary grenade needs to be looked at1 Oct 2015, 13:20 PM are we talking about this again? Good. Give incendiaries to Sturms. (Reasons listed in post #101) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September 24th Hotfix Patch Notes24 Sep 2015, 20:11 PM they should've left the incendiary nade as it was, but given it to Sturmpioneers. That would have saved a lot of trouble. That way it never would have had such potential to be so annoying to so many people, as it is in Sturms nature to be more seldom and more upkeep-heavy. Meh. I say it again. Volks are regular army dudes. Why don't they have regular grenades (anymore)? On the other hand, Sturms are an engi unit. Those tend to have anti-garrison meassures (in the form of flamethrowers), ergo the incendiary would've made a lot more sense on that unit as a 'creative' way of saying 'flamethrower'. In: Lobby
Thread: Volk throw their incendiary grenade too quickly18 Sep 2015, 18:41 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2015, 14:20 PMKatitof You don't get it. Mlotov have long animation, because it have no fuse, it explodes instantly, its thrown slower to give you time to react for it. Same thing with inc nade, it can't stay like it is, unless it gets fuse time, like every other fast thrown nade. What it looks like have nothing to do with it, its pure balance matter. A fuse could be okay. What I was saying is that the molotov throwing animation would look way out of place with that grenade... because it looks like a normal grenade. The molotov throw animation cries ''street riot''; it does not fit anything besides the molotov. And no, I disagree, such things matter. The game is not just numbers and blank balance. Of course the feel, immersion it generates are important! (In that sense, the removal of the standard grenade was already a mistake :/ ) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volk throw their incendiary grenade too quickly18 Sep 2015, 13:18 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2015, 13:11 PMAce of Swords It's too fast, it either need a detonation time (which I don't understand why it doesn't have it) or just a longer throw animation like the molotov. The molotov throw animation would look really stupid on this type of grenade. The new incendiary looks exactly like the grenade they had previouly, it only makes sense they would throw it the same way. If anything, a detonation time. Though I suppose that's not how that type of grenade usually works... I actually like all the effects around it. Can't they just adjust the stats and leave everything that concerns the visuals as it is? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Look what I found!18 Sep 2015, 12:02 PM The Panzer III would fit the Ostheer faction well. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CoH 2 avatars and portraits v2 17 Sep 2015, 17:36 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 17:13 PMCultist_kun Its most likely Ost commander. Of course if this is not fake. I hope it's fake. Looks boring and uninnovate as fuck! Even through the blurredness I can see how crappy that Hetzer icon looks so that better not be sth that Relic made! Otherwise I think the Hetzer is more befitting of OKW than Ost. That aside, what AchtAchter said makes sense, too. In: Lobby
Thread: CoH 2 avatars and portraits v2 17 Sep 2015, 16:54 PM I think the Hetzer is OKW, not Ost. Look at the background of the unit portrait. In: Lobby
Thread: Should Sov and Ost have Forward Retreat Points? 17 Sep 2015, 10:59 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 05:36 AMrobertmikael The logical forward retreat point for Ostheer is the command bunker, and for the Sovjets the forward headquarters, which is a commander ability, but it is better than nothing. I don't care wether or not these 2 factions have forward retreat points, to be honest. But if they were to, these would indeed be the most befitting and logical solutions in my opinion. In: COH2 Balance