Profile of raw

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 644

General Information


Thread: Soviet Faction30 Aug 2013, 22:20 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2013, 22:12 PMGreenDevil If anything Soviets are better at 2v2 because they can split their teching. Yeah, I think that's a downside. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: if oorah got increased to 10 munis30 Aug 2013, 20:57 PM the game is completely broken at the moment. - MG42 can supress instantly - maps like semois are unwinnable for soviets - grenadiers win 2 vs. 1 vs conscripts and engis - AC murders M3 and infantry - soviet has no T2 removal except guards - paks are completely worthless - pzIV still roll over everything short of SU-85 and can drive through 2 Paks like they aren't even there - running flanks with conscripts even with oorah is a completly worthless excercise - the RNG is absolute shit winning as soviet relies on gimmicky killstreaks with M3 and T70. i hope that answers your question. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reliable non-fuel-based AT option for Soviets?30 Aug 2013, 15:21 PM Soviets are in dire need of reliable PzIV removal. The T-34 may be ok for 1v1 now, but in 2on2 where PzIV's pop in packs of two, you simply can't keep up with the german's armor capacity. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: adding competitive cooldown30 Aug 2013, 14:54 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2013, 14:13 PMTimeKilla RAW is the reason this should be added forgets he searches gos AFK go see your doc mate. some of us have to work i am sorry In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Faction30 Aug 2013, 14:32 PM well, you can obviously declare 2on2 competitive all you want. won't change the fact that 2on2 is unplayable for soviets atm. and it won't change the fact that regarding balance 1v1 comes first. why are you even arguing this? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: adding competitive cooldown30 Aug 2013, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2013, 13:36 PMtimujin.il did you mean in 2v2 when your ally leaves? whatever In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: adding competitive cooldown30 Aug 2013, 13:12 PM as long as the RNG exists there is absolutely zero reason for drop ban. leaving games prematurely is the logical consequence of bad gamedesign. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Faction30 Aug 2013, 10:08 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2013, 09:51 AMBasilone 2v2 is probably more competitive than 1v1 considering how the rock paper scissors doctrines are dead, and teching/upgrading has a lot less risk/reward than it did in vcoh. Ha! Still, competitive format is 1v1. Teamplay in team games makes balance irrelevant? That's not what I said. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: adding competitive cooldown30 Aug 2013, 10:02 AM no, but here are some reasons why i leave - in 2v2s and upwards if enemy is AT and i am RT - i go AFK after clicking search button and forgot that I did - i have to go AFK midgame - i crash (the client isn't exactly the most stable piece of software) i can't remember ever quitting a game because of level. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Way does the T34 as a female Sound FX30 Aug 2013, 09:53 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2013, 14:32 PMOrkfaeller The Germans had much more, uh, backwards views on whats a "men's job" and whats a "women's" so, as desperate as they were, they never deployed women, at least not in the numbers as the Soviets. FWIW, the wehrmacht had some 500k women auxiliaries in 1945. About half of these were volunteers. Thexy did the jobs you already listed. At the beginning of the war Hitler stated We possess a generation of healthy men - and we, National Socialists, are going to watch - Germany will not form any section of women grenade throwers or any corps of women elite snipers. but that stance was somewhat softened over the course of the war, allowing women to fill the named auxiliary positions. Yeah, NS ideology had a clear idea of where men and women belong. In: Lobby